Selfish mining strategy elaboration
Prikladnaâ diskretnaâ matematika, no. 3 (2020), pp. 57-77
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
As it was shown by Ittay Eyal and Emin Gün Sirer, the Bitcoin mining protocol is not incentive-compatible, because there exists an attack in which colluding miners obtain a revenue larger than their fair share. We describe an elaboration of Selfish-Mine Strategy and present an extended model of selfish mining based on independency hypothesis: both groups are made their work independently from each other. We describe a new state machine modelling selfish pool strategy. Let the selfish pool has mining power of $p$, $0$, and the others of $(1-p)$. We also consider the situation in which the others mine a block on the previously private branch (frequency $\gamma(1-p)$), and the others mine a block on the public branch (frequency $(1-\gamma)(1-p)$). Main result is an elaboration of an interval in which selfish miners will earn more than their relative mining power: 1) for a given $p$, a pool of size $p$ obtains a revenue larger than than its relative size for $p$ in the following range: $0 p \le 0{.}429$ (the left bound corresponds to $\gamma =1$, and the right one — to $\gamma =0$); 2) for a given $p$, a pool of size $p$ obtains a revenue larger than a revenue of other group in the following range: $0{.}358 \le p \le 0{.}449$.
Keywords:
blockchain, mining, Markov model, state machine.
@article{PDM_2020_3_a4,
author = {A. V. Cheremushkin},
title = {Selfish mining strategy elaboration},
journal = {Prikladna\^a diskretna\^a matematika},
pages = {57--77},
publisher = {mathdoc},
number = {3},
year = {2020},
language = {ru},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/PDM_2020_3_a4/}
}
A. V. Cheremushkin. Selfish mining strategy elaboration. Prikladnaâ diskretnaâ matematika, no. 3 (2020), pp. 57-77. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/PDM_2020_3_a4/