Geodesic
Modification of hierarchies analysis method for the dynamic set of alternatives
Prikladnaâ diskretnaâ matematika, no. 4 (2009), pp. 102-109.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

The problem of incorrect estimation for alternatives in a dynamic set by Saaty's hierarchies analysis method used for regularities discovery and decision-making support is considered. A modified procedure for estimation of alternatives significance is suggested. The properties of this procedure are proved and illustrative examples are given.
Keywords: hierarchies analysis method, lternatives significance, decision-making support. 
@article{PDM_2009_4_a9,
     author = {S. I. Kolesnikova},
     title = {Modification of hierarchies analysis method for the dynamic set of alternatives},
     journal = {Prikladna\^a diskretna\^a matematika},
     pages = {102--109},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     number = {4},
     year = {2009},
     language = {ru},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/PDM_2009_4_a9/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - S. I. Kolesnikova
TI  - Modification of hierarchies analysis method for the dynamic set of alternatives
JO  - Prikladnaâ diskretnaâ matematika
PY  - 2009
SP  - 102
EP  - 109
IS  - 4
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/PDM_2009_4_a9/
LA  - ru
ID  - PDM_2009_4_a9
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A S. I. Kolesnikova
%T Modification of hierarchies analysis method for the dynamic set of alternatives
%J Prikladnaâ diskretnaâ matematika
%D 2009
%P 102-109
%N 4
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/PDM_2009_4_a9/
%G ru
%F PDM_2009_4_a9
S. I. Kolesnikova. Modification of hierarchies analysis method for the dynamic set of alternatives. Prikladnaâ diskretnaâ matematika, no. 4 (2009), pp. 102-109. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/PDM_2009_4_a9/

[1] Saati T. L., Prinyatie reshenii. Metod analiza ierarkhii, Radio i svyaz, M., 1989, 311 pp.

[2] Nogin V. D., “Uproschennyi variant metoda analiza ierarkhii na osnove nelineinoi svertki kriteriev”, Zhurn. vychislit. matem. i matematich. fiz., 44:7 (2004), 1261–1270 | MR

[3] Samokhvalov Yu. Ya., “Gruppovoi uchet otnositelnogo prevoskhodstva alternativ v zadachakh prinyatiya reshenii”, Kibernetika i sistemnyi analiz, 2003, no. 6, 141–145 | MR | Zbl

[4] Kolesnikova S. I., “Sistemnyi podkhod k otsenivaniyu vzaimnogo vliyaniya priznakov v testovom raspoznavanii”, Kibernetika i sistemnyi analiz, 2009, no. 3, 127–135 | Zbl

[5] Kolesnikova S. I., “Metod korrektnogo opredeleniya vesovykh koeffitsientov alternativ v protsedure analiza ierarkhii”, Prikladnaya diskretnaya matematika, Prilozhenie No 1 (2009), 107–109

[6] Kini R. L., Raifa Kh., Prinyatie reshenii pri mnogikh kriteriyakh: predpochteniya i zamescheniya, Radio i svyaz, M., 1981, 560 pp. | MR

[7] Dyukova E. V., Zhuravlev Yu. I., “Diskretnyi analiz priznakovykh opisanii v zadachakh raspoznavaniya bolshoi razmernosti”, Zhurn. vychislit. matem. i matematich. fiz., 40:8 (2000), 1264–1278 | MR | Zbl

[8] Kolesnikova C. I., Yankovskaya A. E., “Otsenka znachimosti priznakov dlya testov v intellektualnykh sistemakh”, Izv. RAN. Teoriya i sistemy upravleniya, 2008, no. 6, 135–148 | MR

[9] Petrovskii A. B., “Uporyadochivanie i klassifikatsiya ob'ektov s protivorechivymi priznakami”, Novosti iskusstvennogo intellekta, 2003, no. 4, 34–43