Geodesic
From ignorance to uncertainty: a conceptual analysis
Kybernetika, Tome 34 (1998) no. 1, pp. 105-120 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Czech Digital Mathematics Library

Voir la notice de l'article

This paper aims to develop an analysis of how ignorance affects the reasoning activity and is related to the concept of uncertainty. With reference to a simple inferential reasoning step, involving a single piece of relational knowledge, we identify four types of ignorance and show how they give rise to different types of uncertainty. We then introduce the concept of reasoning attitude, as a basic choice about how reasoning should be carried out in presence of ignorance. We identify two general attitudes, analyze how they are related to different types of ignorance, and propose some general requirements about how they should affect the reasoning activity. A formalism for uncertain reasoning explicitly including the different types of uncertainty identified and satisfying the stated requirements is finally introduced and its performance is analyzed in simple examples.
This paper aims to develop an analysis of how ignorance affects the reasoning activity and is related to the concept of uncertainty. With reference to a simple inferential reasoning step, involving a single piece of relational knowledge, we identify four types of ignorance and show how they give rise to different types of uncertainty. We then introduce the concept of reasoning attitude, as a basic choice about how reasoning should be carried out in presence of ignorance. We identify two general attitudes, analyze how they are related to different types of ignorance, and propose some general requirements about how they should affect the reasoning activity. A formalism for uncertain reasoning explicitly including the different types of uncertainty identified and satisfying the stated requirements is finally introduced and its performance is analyzed in simple examples.
Classification : 68T37
Keywords: uncertainty; relational knowledge 
@article{KYB_1998_34_1_a9,
     author = {Baroni, Pietro and Guida, Giovanni and Mussi, Silvano},
     title = {From ignorance to uncertainty: a conceptual analysis},
     journal = {Kybernetika},
     pages = {105--120},
     year = {1998},
     volume = {34},
     number = {1},
     zbl = {1274.68513},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/KYB_1998_34_1_a9/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Baroni, Pietro
AU  - Guida, Giovanni
AU  - Mussi, Silvano
TI  - From ignorance to uncertainty: a conceptual analysis
JO  - Kybernetika
PY  - 1998
SP  - 105
EP  - 120
VL  - 34
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/KYB_1998_34_1_a9/
LA  - en
ID  - KYB_1998_34_1_a9
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Baroni, Pietro
%A Guida, Giovanni
%A Mussi, Silvano
%T From ignorance to uncertainty: a conceptual analysis
%J Kybernetika
%D 1998
%P 105-120
%V 34
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/KYB_1998_34_1_a9/
%G en
%F KYB_1998_34_1_a9
Baroni, Pietro; Guida, Giovanni; Mussi, Silvano. From ignorance to uncertainty: a conceptual analysis. Kybernetika, Tome 34 (1998) no. 1, pp. 105-120. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/KYB_1998_34_1_a9/

[1] Bacchus F.: Representing and Reasoning with Probabilistic Knowledge. A Logical Approach to Probabilities. MIT Press, Cambridge 1990 | MR

[2] Baroni P., Guida G., Mussi S.: Modeling default reasoning through $A$–uncertainty. In: Proceedings IPMU’ 96, International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge–Based Systems, Granada 1996, pp. 1197–1204

[3] Benferhat S., Saffiotti A., Smets P.: Belief functions and default reasoning. In: Proc. UAI 95 11th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Montreal 1995 | MR | Zbl

[4] Dubois D., Lang J., Prade H.: Automated reasoning using possibilistic logic: Semantics, belief revision, and variable certainty weights. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engineering KDE–6 (1994), 1, 64–71 | DOI | MR

[5] Halpern J. Y.: An analysis of first–order logics of probability. Artificial Intelligence 46 (1990), 311–350 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[6] Group, Léa Sombé: Reasoning under incomplete information in artificial intelligence: A comparison of formalisms using a single example. Internat. J. Intelligent Systems 5 (1990), 4, 323–472 | DOI | MR

[7] Moses Y., Shoham Y.: Belief as defeasible knowledge. Artificial Intelligence 64 (1993), 299–321 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[8] Nilsson N. J.: Probabilistic logic. Artificial Intelligence 28 (1986), 71–87 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[9] Pearl J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo 1991 | MR | Zbl

[10] Reiter R.: Nonmonotonic reasoning. Ann. Rev. Computer Science 2 (1987), 147–186 | DOI | MR

[11] Saffiotti A.: Using Dempster–Shafer theory in knowledge representation. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6 (P. P. Bonissone, M. Henrion, L. N. Kanal and J. F. Lemmer, eds.), Elsevier, New York 1991, pp. 417–431

[12] Saffiotti A.: A belief–function logic In: Proc. AAAI–92 10th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, 1992, pp. 642–647 | MR

[13] Smets P.: The nature of unnormalized beliefs encountered in the transferable belief model. In: Proc. of Uncertainty in AI 92, pp. 292–297

[14] Smets P., Hsia Y. T.: Default reasoning and the transferable belief model. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 6 (P. P. Bonissone, M. Henrion, L. N. Kanal and J. F. Lemmer, eds.). Elsevier, New York 1991, pp. 495–504