Geodesic
Results of patent and analytical review of the problem of complex structured mixture transformation
Journal of computational and engineering mathematics, Tome 2 (2015) no. 4, pp. 3-10.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

Results of patent and analytical review of the task of complex structured mixture transformation are demonstrated and classified in the paper. The selection and analysis of the most effective science and technological solutions in area of the research are analyzed. The search and selection of the most important periodical sources for research (including foreign sources) are also demonstrated. The generalized diagrams of scientific sources analysis by the imprint date and by the publishing country are show as a system analysis. The results, obtained during the research, allowed to get the adequate representation about the current developments in the field of complex structured mixtures, to determine the degree of field developments, and also to plot a vector for the further work in this research.
Keywords: patent and analytical review, multi objective optimization, linear programming, complex structured mixture. 
@article{JCEM_2015_2_4_a0,
     author = {O. S. Logunova and N. S. Sibileva},
     title = {Results of patent and analytical review of the problem of complex structured mixture transformation},
     journal = {Journal of computational and engineering mathematics},
     pages = {3--10},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {2},
     number = {4},
     year = {2015},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/JCEM_2015_2_4_a0/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - O. S. Logunova
AU  - N. S. Sibileva
TI  - Results of patent and analytical review of the problem of complex structured mixture transformation
JO  - Journal of computational and engineering mathematics
PY  - 2015
SP  - 3
EP  - 10
VL  - 2
IS  - 4
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/JCEM_2015_2_4_a0/
LA  - en
ID  - JCEM_2015_2_4_a0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A O. S. Logunova
%A N. S. Sibileva
%T Results of patent and analytical review of the problem of complex structured mixture transformation
%J Journal of computational and engineering mathematics
%D 2015
%P 3-10
%V 2
%N 4
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/JCEM_2015_2_4_a0/
%G en
%F JCEM_2015_2_4_a0
O. S. Logunova; N. S. Sibileva. Results of patent and analytical review of the problem of complex structured mixture transformation. Journal of computational and engineering mathematics, Tome 2 (2015) no. 4, pp. 3-10. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/JCEM_2015_2_4_a0/

[1] N. S. Sibileva, O. S. Logunova, V. V. Pavlov, “Set-Theoretical Model of Interaction between the Components in the Complex Structured Mixture”, Automation of Technologies and Production, 2015, no. 2 (8), 25–27

[2] O. S. Logunova, E. G. Filippov, I. V. Pavlov, V. V. Pavlov, “Strategy of the Formulation the Task of the Multi-Objective Optimization of the Charge Materials Composition for Electric arc Furnace”, Proceedings of the universities. Ferrous metallurgy, 2013, no. 1, 66–70

[3] N. S. Sibileva, O. S. Logunova, V. V. Pavlov, “The Results of Comparative Analysis of Solving Multicriteria Problems Optimization for Calculation the Structure of Charge Materials for Electric arc Furnace”, Software of Systems in the Industrial and Social Fields, 2013, no. 1, 66–70 [О. С. Логунова, Н. С. Сибилева, В. В. Павлов, “Результаты сравнительного анализа решения многокритериальной задачи оптимизации для расчета структуры шихтовых материалов дуговой сталеплавильной печи”, Математическое и программное обеспечение систем в промышленной и социальной сферах, 2014, No 2, 54–64 ]

[4] Federal Institute of Industrial Property (FIPS), SSRN Working Paper, } {\tt http://www1.fips.ru

[5] N. D. Pankratova, N. I. Nedashkovskaya, “Hybrid Method of Multicriteria Evaluation of Decision Alternatives”, Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 2014, no. 5, 701–711 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[6] F. Le Huede, M. Grabisch, C. Labreuche, P. Saveant, “A New Algorithm for Multicriteria Optimisation in Constraint Programming”, Annals of Operations Research, 147:1 (2006), 143–174 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[7] Rastrigin L. A., Ehjduk Ya. Yu., “Adaptive Methods of Multicriteria Optimization”, Automation and Remote Control, 46 (1985), 1–21 | MR | Zbl

[8] A. V. Timofeev, D. P. Dimitrichenko, “Modeli i metody mnogokriterialnoi optimizatsii alternativ”, Trudy SPIIRAN, 2008, no. 7, 182–194 | MR

[9] B. A. Berezovskii, L. M. Kempner, “Nested Models of Multicriterial Optimization with Priority-Ordered Criteria”, Automation and Remote Control, 1981, no. 1, 105–112 | MR

[10] I. I. Melamed, L. M. Kempner, “A Linear Convolution of Criteria in Multicriterial Optimization”, Automation and Remote Control, 1997, no. 9, 119–125 | MR | Zbl

[11] V. V. Podinovskii, “The Quantitative Importance of Criteria”, AAutomation and Remote Control, 2000, no. 5, 110–123 | MR | Zbl

[12] C. Zopounidis, M. Doumpos, “Multicriteria Decision Systems for Financial Problems”, TOP, 21:2 (2013), 241–261 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[13] A. Engau, C. Moffatt, W. Dyk, “Multicriteria Modeling and Tradeoff Analysis for Oil Load Dispatch and Hauling Operations at Noble Energy”, Optimization and Engineering, 16:1 (2015), 73–101 | DOI | MR

[14] Yu. M. Volin, R. M. Ostrovsky, “Multicriteria Optimization of Technological Processes under Uncertainty Conditions”, Automation and Remote Control, 2007, no. 3, 165–180 | MR | Zbl

[15] L. G. Gurin, “On Multicriterial Optimization Problems under Uncertainty”, Somputational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 44:8 (2004), 1356–1363 | MR | Zbl