Geodesic
Multi-period loan interest rate Nash model with Basel II solvency constraint
The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, Tome 41 (2022), pp. 3-18
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Math-Net.Ru

Voir la notice de l'article

This paper introduces multi–period loan interest rate Nash game models in the banking sector under regulatory solvency constraints. By taking solvency constraint as Basel II and modelling economic condition as AR(1) process, we obtain results regarding the existence of loan interest rate equilibrium. A sensitivity analysis for the solvency constraint model and some numerical results are presented.
Keywords: Nash equilibrium model, one factor KMV/Riskmetrics model, Basel II solvency constraint, credit rating, loan interest rate. 
@article{IIGUM_2022_41_a0,
     author = {Kh. Enkhbayar and G. Battulga and S. Batbileg},
     title = {Multi-period loan interest rate {Nash} model with {Basel~II} solvency constraint},
     journal = {The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics},
     pages = {3--18},
     year = {2022},
     volume = {41},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IIGUM_2022_41_a0/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kh. Enkhbayar
AU  - G. Battulga
AU  - S. Batbileg
TI  - Multi-period loan interest rate Nash model with Basel II solvency constraint
JO  - The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics
PY  - 2022
SP  - 3
EP  - 18
VL  - 41
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IIGUM_2022_41_a0/
LA  - en
ID  - IIGUM_2022_41_a0
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Kh. Enkhbayar
%A G. Battulga
%A S. Batbileg
%T Multi-period loan interest rate Nash model with Basel II solvency constraint
%J The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics
%D 2022
%P 3-18
%V 41
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IIGUM_2022_41_a0/
%G en
%F IIGUM_2022_41_a0
Kh. Enkhbayar; G. Battulga; S. Batbileg. Multi-period loan interest rate Nash model with Basel II solvency constraint. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Mathematics, Tome 41 (2022), pp. 3-18. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/IIGUM_2022_41_a0/

[1] Altangerel L., Battur G., “Perturbation approach to generalized Nash equilibrium problems with shared constraints”, Optimization Letters, 6:7 (2012), 379–1391 | DOI | MR

[2] Battulga G., Altangerel L., Battur G., “An extension of one–period Nash equilibrium model in non–life insurance markets”, Applied Mathematics, 09:12 (2018), 1339–1350 | DOI

[3] Battulga G., Altangerel L., Battur G., “Loan interest rate Nash models with solvency constraints in the banking sector”, Optimization Methods and Software, 2021, 1–18 | DOI | MR

[4] Bluhm C., Overbeck L., Wagner C., Introduction to Credit Risk Modeling, Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2012 | MR

[5] Crosbie P., Bohn J., Modeling default risk: modeling methodology, Moody's KMV, 2003

[6] Crouhy M., Galai D., Mark R., “A comparative analysis of current credit risk models”, Journal of Banking Finance, 24:1–2 (2000), 59–117 | DOI

[7] Drumond I., Jorge J., “Loan interest rates under risk–based capital requirements: The impact of banking market structure”, Economic Modelling, 32:C (2013), 602–607 | DOI

[8] Dutang C., Albrecher H., and Loisel S., “Competition among non–life insurers under solvency constraints: A game–theoretic approach”, European Journal of Operational Research, 231:3 (2013), 702–711 | DOI | MR | Zbl

[9] Facchinei F., Pang J., Finite–Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems, v. 1, Springer, 2003 | MR

[10] Frey R., McNeil A., “Dependent defaults in models of portfolio credit risk”, The Journal of Risk, 6:1 (2003), 59–92 | DOI | MR

[11] Furfine C., “Bank portfolio allocation: the impact of capital requirements, regulatory monitoring and economic conditions”, Journal of Financial Services Research, 20:1 (2001), 33–56 | DOI

[12] Gordy M. B., “A comparative anatomy of credit risk models”, Journal of Banking Finance, 24:1–2 (2000), 119–149 | DOI

[13] Gordy M. B., “A risk–factor model foundation for ratings–based bank capital rules”, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12:3 (2003), 199–232 | DOI

[14] Gupton G. M., Finger C. C., Bhatia M., CreditMetrics–Technical Document, JP Morgan, New York, 1997

[15] Kim D., Santomero A., “Risk in banking and capital regulation”, Journal of Finance, 43:5 (1988), 1219–1233 | DOI

[16] McNeil A., Frey R., Embrechts P., Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques, and Tools, Princeton University Press, 2005 | MR | Zbl

[17] Rau-Bredow H., “Value at risk, expected shortfall, and marginal risk contribution”, Risk Measures for the 21st Century, ed. Szego G., 2004, 61–68

[18] S Default, Transition and Recovery: 2020 Annual Global Corporate Default Study and Rating Transitions. Global Fixed Income Research, Standard Poors Financial Services, 2021

[19] Solodov M. V., Svaiter B. F., “A new projection method for variational inequality”, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 37:3 (1999), 76–776 | DOI | MR