Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
@article{DVMG_2013_13_1_a0, author = {K. S. Bormotin}, title = {The uniqueness of quasistatic problems of creep forming}, journal = {Dalʹnevosto\v{c}nyj matemati\v{c}eskij \v{z}urnal}, pages = {3--14}, publisher = {mathdoc}, volume = {13}, number = {1}, year = {2013}, language = {ru}, url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/DVMG_2013_13_1_a0/} }
K. S. Bormotin. The uniqueness of quasistatic problems of creep forming. Dalʹnevostočnyj matematičeskij žurnal, Tome 13 (2013) no. 1, pp. 3-14. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/DVMG_2013_13_1_a0/
[1] I. A. Banschikova, B. V. Gorev, I. V. Sukhorukov, “Dvumernye zadachi formoobrazovaniya sterzhnei v usloviyakh polzuchesti”, Prikladnaya mekhanika i tekhnicheskaya fizika, 43:3 (2002), 129–139
[2] I. Yu. Tsvelodub, Postulat ustoichivosti i ego prilozheniya v teorii polzuchesti metallicheskikh materialov, IGiL SO AN SSSR, Novosibirsk, 1991
[3] I. Yu. Tsvelodub, “Nekotorye geometricheski nelineinye zadachi formoizmeneniya neuprugikh plastin i pologikh obolochek”, Prikladnaya mekhanika i tekhnicheskaya fizika, 46:2 (2005), 151–157 | MR | Zbl
[4] R. Hill, “On uniqueness and stability in the theory of finite elastic strain”, J. Mech. Phys. Solids., 5:4 (1957), 229–241, V ; R. Khill, “O edinstvennosti i ustoichivosti v teorii konechnykh uprugikh deformatsii”, Mekhanika: Sb. perevodov, 3(49) (1958), 53–65 | DOI | MR
[5] C. H. Korobeinikov, Nelineinoe deformirovanie tverdykh tel, SO RAN, Novosibirsk, 2000
[6] K. S. Bormotin, “Variatsionnye metody resheniya obratnoi zadachi optimalnogo deformirovaniya v polzuchesti”, Informatika i sistemy upravleniya, 2(28) (2011), 106–116
[7] Yu. N. Rabotnov, Polzuchest elementov konstruktsii, Izd-vo «NAUKA», M, 1966
[8] K. Vasidzu, Variatsionnye metody v teorii uprugosti i plastichnosti, Per. s angl., Mir, M, 1987
[9] A. A. Ilyushin, Plastichnost, Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo Tekhniko-teoreticheskoi literatury, M, 1948