Geodesic
Models of concordance of public and private interests in control systems
Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 8 (2015), pp. 47-57.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru

The problem of resource allocation is considered by taking into account the allocation among public and private agent's interests.The problem of concordance of public and private interests (CPPI) in several forms is considered, the comparative characteristics of different approaches to the problem in terms of social welfare are found. The values of price of anarchy and social price of anarchy for different private and public interests functions are calculated. The problem of system compatibility is considered, preliminary results on system compatibility mechanisms of economic compulsion and impulsion and administrative compulsion in CPPI-models are obtained. In the most cases, system compatibility in CPPI-models means that all agents are either pure individualists or pure collectivists.
Keywords: system compatability, hierarchy, union in coalition, public purpose, private purpose. 
@article{CGTM_2015_8_a4,
     author = {Olga I. Gorbaneva and Guennady A. Ougolnitsky},
     title = {Models of concordance of public and private interests in control systems},
     journal = {Contributions to game theory and management},
     pages = {47--57},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {8},
     year = {2015},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2015_8_a4/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Olga I. Gorbaneva
AU  - Guennady A. Ougolnitsky
TI  - Models of concordance of public and private interests in control systems
JO  - Contributions to game theory and management
PY  - 2015
SP  - 47
EP  - 57
VL  - 8
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2015_8_a4/
LA  - en
ID  - CGTM_2015_8_a4
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Olga I. Gorbaneva
%A Guennady A. Ougolnitsky
%T Models of concordance of public and private interests in control systems
%J Contributions to game theory and management
%D 2015
%P 47-57
%V 8
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2015_8_a4/
%G en
%F CGTM_2015_8_a4
Olga I. Gorbaneva; Guennady A. Ougolnitsky. Models of concordance of public and private interests in control systems. Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 8 (2015), pp. 47-57. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2015_8_a4/

[1] N. Nisan, T. Roughgarden, E. Tardos, V. Vazirani (eds.), Algorithmic Game Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2007 | MR | Zbl

[2] Antonenko A. V., Ugol'nitskii G. A. Usov A. B., “Static model of struggle with cottuption in hierarchical management systems”, Journal of Computer and Systems Science International, 52:4 (2013), 664–675 (in Russian) | MR | Zbl

[3] Burkov V. N., Opoitsev V. I., “Metagame approach to the control in hierarchical systems”, Automation and Remote Control, 35:1 (1974), 93–103 (in Russian) | MR | Zbl

[4] Germeier Yu. B. Vatel I. A., “Equilibrium situations in games with a hierarchical structure of the vector criteria”, Lectures Notes in Computer Science, 27, 1975, 460–465 (in Russian) | Zbl

[5] Gorbaneva O., Ougolnitsky G., “Purpose and Non-Purpose Resource Use Models in Two-Level Control Systems”, Advances in Systems Science and Application, 13:4 (2013), 378–390 (in Russian)

[6] D. Novikov (ed.), Mechanism design and management: Mathematical methods for smart organizations, Nova Science Publishers, N.Y., 2013 (in Russian)

[7] Papadimitriou C. H., “Algorithms, games, and the Internet”, Proc. 33th Symposium Theory of Computing (2001), 749–753 | MR