Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Math-Net.Ru
@article{CGTM_2010_3_a24, author = {Sergei L. Pechersky}, title = {Proportionality in {NTU} {Games:} on a {Consistent} {Proportional} {Solution}}, journal = {Contributions to game theory and management}, pages = {313--321}, publisher = {mathdoc}, volume = {3}, year = {2010}, language = {en}, url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2010_3_a24/} }
Sergei L. Pechersky. Proportionality in NTU Games: on a Consistent Proportional Solution. Contributions to game theory and management, Tome 3 (2010), pp. 313-321. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/CGTM_2010_3_a24/
[1] Hart S., Mas-Colell A., “Potential, value, and consistency”, Econometrica, 57 (1989), 589–614 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[2] Kalai E., “Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparision”, Econometrica, 45 (1977), 1623–1630 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[3] Kalai E., Samet D., “Monotonic solutions to general cooperative games”, Econometrica, 53 (1985), 307–327 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[4] Lensberg T., “Stability and the Nash solution”, J. Econ. Theory, 45 (1988), 330–341 | DOI | MR | Zbl
[5] Pechersky S., “Proportionality in NTU games: excesses and solutions”, Collected papers presented on the International Conference Game Theory and Management (St. Petersburg, 2007), Contributions to Game Theory and Management, 1, 394–412
[6] Pechersky S., “Proportionality in bargaining games: status quo-proportional solution and consistency”, Collected papers presented on the International Conference Game Theory and Management (St. Petersburg, 2009), Contributions to Game Theory and Management, 2, 334–343 | MR
[7] Rockafellar R. T., Convex analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1997 | MR | Zbl