Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Library of Science
@article{BSL_2022_51_1_a0, author = {L\'opez, Sandra M.}, title = {Ternary {Relational} {Semantics} for the {Variants} of {BN4} and {E4} which {Contain} {Routley} and {Meyer's} {Logic} {B}}, journal = {Bulletin of the Section of Logic}, pages = {27--56}, publisher = {mathdoc}, volume = {51}, number = {1}, year = {2022}, language = {en}, url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/BSL_2022_51_1_a0/} }
TY - JOUR AU - López, Sandra M. TI - Ternary Relational Semantics for the Variants of BN4 and E4 which Contain Routley and Meyer's Logic B JO - Bulletin of the Section of Logic PY - 2022 SP - 27 EP - 56 VL - 51 IS - 1 PB - mathdoc UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/BSL_2022_51_1_a0/ LA - en ID - BSL_2022_51_1_a0 ER -
López, Sandra M. Ternary Relational Semantics for the Variants of BN4 and E4 which Contain Routley and Meyer's Logic B. Bulletin of the Section of Logic, Tome 51 (2022) no. 1, pp. 27-56. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/BSL_2022_51_1_a0/
[1] A. R. Anderson, N. D. Belnap, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. I, Princeton University Press (1975).
[2] A. R. Anderson, N. D. Belnap, J. M. Dunn, Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. II, Princeton University Press (1992).
[3] R. T. Brady, Completeness proofs for the systems RM3 and BN4, Logique et Analyse, vol. 25 (1982), pp. 9–32.
[4] R. T. Brady (ed.), Relevant Logics and their Rivals, vol. II, Ashgate (2003).
[5] R. T. Brady, Universal Logic, CSLI (2006).
[6] S. M. López, Belnap-Dunn semantics for the variants of BN4 and E4 which contain Routley and Meyer’s logic B, Logic and Logical Philosophy, (Online First), pp. 1–28 | DOI
[7] R. K. Meyer, S. Giambrone, R. T. Brady, Where Gamma fails, Studia Logica, vol. 43 (1984), pp. 247–256 | DOI
[8] H. Omori, H. Wansing, 40 years of FDE: An Introductory Overview, Studia Logica, vol. 105 (2017), pp. 1021–1049 | DOI
[9] G. Robles, J. M. Blanco, S. M. López, J. R. Paradela, M. M. Recio, Relational Semantics for the 4-valued relevant logics BN4 and E4, Logic and Logical Philosophy, vol. 25(2) (2016), pp. 173–201 | DOI
[10] G. Robles, J. M. Méndez, A companion to Brady’s 4-valued relevant logic BN4: The 4-valued logic of entailment E4, Logic Journal of the IGLP, vol. 24(5) (2016), pp. 838–858 | DOI
[11] R. Routley, V. Plumwood, R. K. Meyer, R. T. Brady, Relevant Logics and their Rivals, vol. I, Ridgeview (1982).
[12] J. K. Slaney, Relevant Logic and Paraconsistency, [in:] L. Bertossi, A. Hunter, T. Schaub (eds.), Inconsistency Tolerance, vol. 3300 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer (2005), pp. 270–293 | DOI
[13] R. Sylvan, V. Plumwood, Non-normal relevant logics, [in:] R. T. Brady (ed.), Relevant Logics and their Rivals, vol. II, Western Philosophy Series, Ashgate, Aldershot and Burlington (2003), pp. 10–16.