Geodesic
A Hybrid Procedure for Network Multi-Criteria Systems
Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Facultas Rerum Naturalium. Mathematica, Tome 52 (2013) no. 2, pp. 53-60 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Czech Digital Mathematics Library

Voir la notice de l'article

Many of today’s systems are characterized by a network structure and evaluation of alternatives is based on multiple criteria. Network systems contain both positive and negative feedbacks. In the paper, a hybrid procedure is proposed for operation in network environment. The procedure is based on a combination of DEMATEL, ANP, and PROMETHEE approaches. DEMATEL is a comprehensive method for building and analyzing a structural model involving causal relationships between complex factors. For the network seems to be very appropriate Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach. The ANP makes possible to deal systematically with all kinds of dependence and feedback in the system. PROMETHEE methods are methods for multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives, based on preference relations between alternatives, which may be expressed as a network. These methods have specific advantages in analyzing and evaluating network systems. The combination of these approaches gives a powerful instrument for analyzing network systems by multiple criteria.
Many of today’s systems are characterized by a network structure and evaluation of alternatives is based on multiple criteria. Network systems contain both positive and negative feedbacks. In the paper, a hybrid procedure is proposed for operation in network environment. The procedure is based on a combination of DEMATEL, ANP, and PROMETHEE approaches. DEMATEL is a comprehensive method for building and analyzing a structural model involving causal relationships between complex factors. For the network seems to be very appropriate Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach. The ANP makes possible to deal systematically with all kinds of dependence and feedback in the system. PROMETHEE methods are methods for multi-criteria evaluation of alternatives, based on preference relations between alternatives, which may be expressed as a network. These methods have specific advantages in analyzing and evaluating network systems. The combination of these approaches gives a powerful instrument for analyzing network systems by multiple criteria.
Classification : 90B10, 90B50
Keywords: network problems; multiple criteria; DEMATEL; ANP; PROMETHEE 
@article{AUPO_2013_52_2_a4,
     author = {Fiala, Petr},
     title = {A {Hybrid} {Procedure} for {Network} {Multi-Criteria} {Systems}},
     journal = {Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Facultas Rerum Naturalium. Mathematica},
     pages = {53--60},
     year = {2013},
     volume = {52},
     number = {2},
     mrnumber = {3202379},
     zbl = {06296014},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AUPO_2013_52_2_a4/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fiala, Petr
TI  - A Hybrid Procedure for Network Multi-Criteria Systems
JO  - Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Facultas Rerum Naturalium. Mathematica
PY  - 2013
SP  - 53
EP  - 60
VL  - 52
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AUPO_2013_52_2_a4/
LA  - en
ID  - AUPO_2013_52_2_a4
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Fiala, Petr
%T A Hybrid Procedure for Network Multi-Criteria Systems
%J Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Facultas Rerum Naturalium. Mathematica
%D 2013
%P 53-60
%V 52
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AUPO_2013_52_2_a4/
%G en
%F AUPO_2013_52_2_a4
Fiala, Petr. A Hybrid Procedure for Network Multi-Criteria Systems. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis. Facultas Rerum Naturalium. Mathematica, Tome 52 (2013) no. 2, pp. 53-60. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/item/AUPO_2013_52_2_a4/

[1] Brans, J.-P., Mareschal, B.: PROMETHEE Methods. In: Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, Springer, Boston, 2005, 163–195. | Zbl

[2] Fiala, P.: An ANP/DNP analysis of economic elements in today’s world network economy. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 15 (2006), 131–140. | DOI

[3] Gabus, A., Fontela, E.: World Problems, an Invitation to Further Thought within the Framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Centre, Geneva, 1972.

[4] Ou Yang, Z. P., Shieh, H. M., Leu, J. D., Tzeng, G. H.: A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. International Journal of Operations Research 5 (2008), 160–168.

[5] Saaty, T. L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996.

[6] Saaty, T. L.: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 2001.

[7] Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., Li, C. W.: Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications 32 (2007), 1028–1044. | DOI