Keywords: Lebesgue measure; nonmeasurable set; axiom of choice
@article{10_21136_MB_2002_133985,
author = {Sardella, Mirko and Ziliotti, Guido},
title = {What{\textquoteright}s the price of a nonmeasurable set?},
journal = {Mathematica Bohemica},
pages = {41--48},
year = {2002},
volume = {127},
number = {1},
doi = {10.21136/MB.2002.133985},
mrnumber = {1895245},
zbl = {1006.28003},
language = {en},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.21136/MB.2002.133985/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Sardella, Mirko AU - Ziliotti, Guido TI - What’s the price of a nonmeasurable set? JO - Mathematica Bohemica PY - 2002 SP - 41 EP - 48 VL - 127 IS - 1 UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.21136/MB.2002.133985/ DO - 10.21136/MB.2002.133985 LA - en ID - 10_21136_MB_2002_133985 ER -
Sardella, Mirko; Ziliotti, Guido. What’s the price of a nonmeasurable set?. Mathematica Bohemica, Tome 127 (2002) no. 1, pp. 41-48. doi: 10.21136/MB.2002.133985
[1] S. Banach, A. Tarski: Sur la dΘcomposition des ensembles de points en parties respectivement congruentes. Fund. Math. 6 (1924), 244–277. | DOI
[2] K. Ciesielski: How good is Lebesgue measure? Math. Intell. 11 (1984), 54–58. | MR
[3] P. Erdös: On some properties of Hamel bases. Coll. Math. 10 (1963), 267–269. | DOI | MR
[4] M. Foreman, F. Wehrung: The Hahn-Banach Theorem implies the existence of a non-Lebesgue measurable set. Fund. Math. 138 (1991), 13–19. | DOI | MR
[5] B. R. Gelbaum, J. M. H. Olmstead: Counterexamples in analysis. Holden-Day, San Francisco, 1964. | MR
[6] P. H. Halmos: Measure theory. Second edition, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1950. | MR | Zbl
[7] I. Halperin: Non-measurable sets and the equation $f(x+y) = f(x)+f(y)$. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1951), 221–224. | MR | Zbl
[8] T. Jech: The Axiom of Choice. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973. | MR | Zbl
[9] J. L. Kelley: General topology. Van Nostrand, New York, 1955. | MR | Zbl
[10] M. Kuczma, J. Smítal: On measures connected with the Cauchy equation. Aequationes Math. 14 (1976), 421–428. | DOI | MR
[11] M. Kuczma: On some properties of Erdös sets. Coll. Math. 48 (1984), 127–134. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[12] G. Moore: Zermelo’s Axiom of Choice. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1982. | MR | Zbl
[13] J. Mycielski, S. Swierczkowski: On the Lebesgue measurability and the axiom of determinateness. Fund. Math. 54 (1964), 67–71. | DOI | MR
[14] J. Pawlikowski: The Hahn-Banach Theorem implies the Banach-Tarski paradox. Fund. Math. 138 (1991), 21–22. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[15] D. Pincus: The strength of Hahn-Banach’s Theorem. Victoria Symposium on Non-Standard Analysis vol. 369, Lecture Notes in Math. Springer, 1974, pp. 203–248. | MR
[16] D. Pincus, R. Solovay: Definability of measures and ultrafilters. J. Symbolic Logic 42 (1977), 179–190. | DOI | MR
[17] J. Raissonier: A mathematical proof of S. Shelah’s theorem on the measure problem and related results. Israel J. Math. 48 (1984), 48–56. | DOI | MR
[18] W. Sierpiński: Sur la question de la mesurabilité de la base de M. Hamel. Fund. Math. 1 (1920), 105–111. | DOI
[19] W. Sierpiński: Sur un problème concernant les ensembles mesurables superficiellement. Fund. Math. 1 (1920), 112–115. | DOI
[20] W. Sierpiński: Fonctions additives non complétement additives et fonctions mesurables. Fund. Math. 30 (1938), 96–99. | DOI
[21] A. Simonson: On two halves being two wholes. Math. Montly 91 (1984), 190–193. | DOI | MR
[22] S. Shelah: Can you take Solovay’s inaccessible away? Israel J. Math. 48 (1984), 1–47. | DOI | MR
[23] R. Solovay: A model of set theory in which every set of reals is Lebesgue-measurable. Ann. of Math. 92 (1970), 1–56. | DOI | MR | Zbl
[24] S. Ulam: Concerning functions of sets. Fund. Math. 14 (1929), 231–233. | DOI
[25] G. Vitali: Sul problema della misura dei gruppi di punti di una retta. Bologna, 1905.
[26] S. Wagon: The Banach-Tarski paradox. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986. | MR
[27] W. Wilkosz: Sugli insiemi non-misurabili (L). Fund. Math. 1 (1920), 82–92. | DOI
Cité par Sources :