Some remarks on morphisms between Fano threefolds: Erratum [cf. Doc. Math. J. DMV 9, 471–486 (2004; Zbl 1072.14048)]
Documenta mathematica, Tome 10 (2005), pp. 367-368
It was pointed out to me by James McKernan that there is a mistake in the proof of Proposition 2.7. Namely, it is stated (and “used”) there that the complement to a smooth conic in P2 is simply-connected. This is obviously false; indeed, the fundamental group is cyclic of order two. This mistake is, however, easy to deal with.
@article{10_4171_dm_193,
author = {Ekaterina Amerik},
title = {Some remarks on morphisms between {Fano} threefolds: {Erratum} [cf. {Doc.} {Math.} {J.} {DMV} 9, 471{\textendash}486 (2004; {Zbl} 1072.14048)]},
journal = {Documenta mathematica},
pages = {367--368},
year = {2005},
volume = {10},
doi = {10.4171/dm/193},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4171/dm/193/}
}
TY - JOUR AU - Ekaterina Amerik TI - Some remarks on morphisms between Fano threefolds: Erratum [cf. Doc. Math. J. DMV 9, 471–486 (2004; Zbl 1072.14048)] JO - Documenta mathematica PY - 2005 SP - 367 EP - 368 VL - 10 UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4171/dm/193/ DO - 10.4171/dm/193 ID - 10_4171_dm_193 ER -
Ekaterina Amerik. Some remarks on morphisms between Fano threefolds: Erratum [cf. Doc. Math. J. DMV 9, 471–486 (2004; Zbl 1072.14048)]. Documenta mathematica, Tome 10 (2005), pp. 367-368. doi: 10.4171/dm/193
Cité par Sources :