Distances to convex sets
Studia Mathematica, Tome 182 (2007) no. 2, pp. 165-181
Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source Institute of Mathematics Polish Academy of Sciences
If $X$ is a Banach space and $C$ a convex subset of $X^*$,
we investigate whether
the distance $\hat d({{\overline {\rm {co}}}}^{w^*}(K),C):=\sup
\{\inf\{\|k-c\|:c\in C\}:k\in \overline {\rm {co}} ^{w^*}(K)\}$ from $\overline {\rm {co}}
^{w^*}(K)$ to $C$ is $M$-controlled by the distance $\hat d(K,C)$
(that is, if $\hat d({{\overline {\rm {co}}}}^{w^*}(K),C)\leq M \hat d(K,C)$ for
some $1\leq M\infty $), when $K$ is any weak$^*$-compact subset
of $X^*$. We prove, for example, that: (i) $C$ has 3-control if
$C$ contains no copy of the basis of $\ell _1( c )$; (ii) $C$
has 1-control when $C\subset Y\subset X^*$ and $Y$ is a subspace
with weak$^*$-angelic closed dual unit ball $B(Y^*)$; (iii) if
$C$ is a convex subset of $X$ and $X$ is considered canonically
embedded into its bidual $X^{**}$, then $C$ has 5-control inside
$X^{**}$, in general, and 2-control when $K\cap C$ is
weak$^*$-dense in $C$.
Keywords:
banach space convex subset nbsp * investigate whether distance hat overline * sup inf k c overline * overline * m controlled distance hat hat overline * leq hat leq infty weak * compact subset * prove example has control contains copy basis ell has control subset subset * subspace weak * angelic closed dual unit ball * iii convex subset considered canonically embedded its bidual ** has control inside ** general control cap weak * dense
Affiliations des auteurs :
Antonio S. Granero 1 ; Marcos Sánchez 1
@article{10_4064_sm182_2_5,
author = {Antonio S. Granero and Marcos S\'anchez},
title = {Distances to convex sets},
journal = {Studia Mathematica},
pages = {165--181},
publisher = {mathdoc},
volume = {182},
number = {2},
year = {2007},
doi = {10.4064/sm182-2-5},
language = {en},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.4064/sm182-2-5/}
}
Antonio S. Granero; Marcos Sánchez. Distances to convex sets. Studia Mathematica, Tome 182 (2007) no. 2, pp. 165-181. doi: 10.4064/sm182-2-5
Cité par Sources :