By now, the Maker-Breaker connectivity game on a complete graph $K_n$ or on a random graph $G\sim G_{n,p}$ is well studied. Recently, London and Pluhár suggested a variant in which Maker always needs to choose her edges in such a way that her graph stays connected. By their results it follows that for this connected version of the game, the threshold bias on $K_n$ and the threshold probability on $G\sim G_{n,p}$ for winning the game drastically differ from the corresponding values for the usual Maker-Breaker version, assuming Maker's bias to be 1. However, they observed that the threshold biases of both versions played on $K_n$ are still of the same order if instead Maker is allowed to claim two edges in every round. Naturally, this made London and Pluhár ask whether a similar phenomenon can be observed when a $(2:2)$ game is played on $G_{n,p}$. We prove that this is not the case, and determine the threshold probability for winning this game to be of size $n^{-2/3+o(1)}$.
@article{10_37236_9381,
author = {Dennis Clemens and Laurin Kirsch and Yannick Mogge},
title = {Connector-breaker games on random boards},
journal = {The electronic journal of combinatorics},
year = {2021},
volume = {28},
number = {3},
doi = {10.37236/9381},
zbl = {1467.05171},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/9381/}
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Dennis Clemens
AU - Laurin Kirsch
AU - Yannick Mogge
TI - Connector-breaker games on random boards
JO - The electronic journal of combinatorics
PY - 2021
VL - 28
IS - 3
UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/9381/
DO - 10.37236/9381
ID - 10_37236_9381
ER -
%0 Journal Article
%A Dennis Clemens
%A Laurin Kirsch
%A Yannick Mogge
%T Connector-breaker games on random boards
%J The electronic journal of combinatorics
%D 2021
%V 28
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/9381/
%R 10.37236/9381
%F 10_37236_9381
Dennis Clemens; Laurin Kirsch; Yannick Mogge. Connector-breaker games on random boards. The electronic journal of combinatorics, Tome 28 (2021) no. 3. doi: 10.37236/9381