Let $X$ be a finite collection of sets (or "clusters"). We consider the problem of counting the number of ways a cluster $A \in X$ can be partitioned into two disjoint clusters $A_1, A_2 \in X$, thus $A = A_1 \uplus A_2$ is the disjoint union of $A_1$ and $A_2$; this problem arises in the run time analysis of the ASTRAL algorithm in phylogenetic reconstruction. We obtain the bound$$ | \{ (A_1,A_2,A) \in X \times X \times X: A = A_1 \uplus A_2 \} | \leq |X|^{3/p} $$where $|X|$ denotes the cardinality of $X$, and $p := \log_3 \frac{27}{4} = 1.73814\dots$, so that $\frac{3}{p} = 1.72598\dots$. Furthermore, the exponent $p$ cannot be replaced by any larger quantity. This improves upon the trivial bound of $|X|^2$. The argument relies on establishing a one-dimensional convolution inequality that can be established by elementary calculus combined with some numerical verification.In a similar vein, we show that for any subset $A$ of a discrete cube $\{0,1\}^n$, the additive energy of $A$ (the number of quadruples $(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4)$ in $A^4$ with $a_1+a_2=a_3+a_4$) is at most $|A|^{\log_2 6}$, and that this exponent is best possible.
@article{10_37236_6797,
author = {Daniel Kane and Terence Tao},
title = {A bound on partitioning clusters},
journal = {The electronic journal of combinatorics},
year = {2017},
volume = {24},
number = {2},
doi = {10.37236/6797},
zbl = {1432.05114},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/6797/}
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Daniel Kane
AU - Terence Tao
TI - A bound on partitioning clusters
JO - The electronic journal of combinatorics
PY - 2017
VL - 24
IS - 2
UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/6797/
DO - 10.37236/6797
ID - 10_37236_6797
ER -
%0 Journal Article
%A Daniel Kane
%A Terence Tao
%T A bound on partitioning clusters
%J The electronic journal of combinatorics
%D 2017
%V 24
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/6797/
%R 10.37236/6797
%F 10_37236_6797
Daniel Kane; Terence Tao. A bound on partitioning clusters. The electronic journal of combinatorics, Tome 24 (2017) no. 2. doi: 10.37236/6797