The Frankl conjecture, also known as the union-closed sets conjecture, states that in any finite non-empty union-closed family, there exists an element in at least half of the sets. From an optimization point of view, one could instead prove that $2a$ is an upper bound to the number of sets in a union-closed family on a ground set of $n$ elements where each element is in at most $a$ sets for all $a,n\in \mathbb{N}^+$. Similarly, one could prove that the minimum number of sets containing the most frequent element in a (non-empty) union-closed family with $m$ sets and $n$ elements is at least $\frac{m}{2}$ for any $m,n\in \mathbb{N}^+$. Formulating these problems as integer programs, we observe that the optimal values we computed do not vary with $n$. We formalize these observations as conjectures, and show that they are not equivalent to the Frankl conjecture while still having wide-reaching implications if proven true. Finally, we prove special cases of the new conjectures and discuss possible approaches to solve them completely.
@article{10_37236_5749,
author = {Jonad Pulaj and Annie Raymond and Dirk Theis},
title = {New conjectures for union-closed families},
journal = {The electronic journal of combinatorics},
year = {2016},
volume = {23},
number = {3},
doi = {10.37236/5749},
zbl = {1412.05193},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/5749/}
}
TY - JOUR
AU - Jonad Pulaj
AU - Annie Raymond
AU - Dirk Theis
TI - New conjectures for union-closed families
JO - The electronic journal of combinatorics
PY - 2016
VL - 23
IS - 3
UR - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/5749/
DO - 10.37236/5749
ID - 10_37236_5749
ER -
%0 Journal Article
%A Jonad Pulaj
%A Annie Raymond
%A Dirk Theis
%T New conjectures for union-closed families
%J The electronic journal of combinatorics
%D 2016
%V 23
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/5749/
%R 10.37236/5749
%F 10_37236_5749
Jonad Pulaj; Annie Raymond; Dirk Theis. New conjectures for union-closed families. The electronic journal of combinatorics, Tome 23 (2016) no. 3. doi: 10.37236/5749