Inequivalence of difference sets: on a remark of Baumert
The electronic journal of combinatorics, Tome 20 (2013) no. 1
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics website

Voir la notice de l'article

An often cited statement of Baumert in his book Cyclic difference sets asserts that four well known families of cyclic $(4t-1,2t-1,t-1)$ difference sets are inequivalent, apart from a small number of exceptions with $t< 8$. We are not aware of a proof of this statement in the literature.Three of the families discussed by Baumert have analogous constructions in non-cyclic groups. We extend his inequivalence statement to a general inequivalence result, for which we provide a complete and self-contained proof. We preface our proof with a survey of the four families of difference sets, since there seems to be some confusion in the literature between the cyclic and non-cyclic cases.
DOI : 10.37236/2277
Classification : 05B10, 05B20
Mots-clés : difference sets, Hadamard matrices

Padraig Ó Catháin  1

1 University of Queensland
@article{10_37236_2277,
     author = {Padraig \'O Cath\'ain},
     title = {Inequivalence of difference sets: on a remark of {Baumert}},
     journal = {The electronic journal of combinatorics},
     year = {2013},
     volume = {20},
     number = {1},
     doi = {10.37236/2277},
     zbl = {1267.05048},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/2277/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Padraig Ó Catháin
TI  - Inequivalence of difference sets: on a remark of Baumert
JO  - The electronic journal of combinatorics
PY  - 2013
VL  - 20
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/2277/
DO  - 10.37236/2277
ID  - 10_37236_2277
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Padraig Ó Catháin
%T Inequivalence of difference sets: on a remark of Baumert
%J The electronic journal of combinatorics
%D 2013
%V 20
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.37236/2277/
%R 10.37236/2277
%F 10_37236_2277
Padraig Ó Catháin. Inequivalence of difference sets: on a remark of Baumert. The electronic journal of combinatorics, Tome 20 (2013) no. 1. doi: 10.37236/2277

Cité par Sources :