Pin(2)–equivariant KO–theory and intersection forms of spin 4–manifolds
Algebraic and Geometric Topology, Tome 15 (2015) no. 2, pp. 863-902
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Mathematical Sciences Publishers

Voir la notice de l'article

Using the Seiberg–Witten Floer spectrum and Pin(2)–equivariant KO–theory, we prove new Furuta-type inequalities on the intersection forms of spin cobordisms between homology 3–spheres. We then give explicit constrains on the intersection forms of spin 4–manifolds bounded by Brieskorn spheres ± Σ(2,3,6k ± 1). Along the way, we also give an alternative proof of Furuta’s improvement of 10 8 –theorem for closed spin 4–manifolds.

DOI : 10.2140/agt.2015.15.863
Classification : 57R58, 57R57
Keywords: Seiberg–Witten theory, $4$–manifold, equivariant KO–theory

Lin, Jianfeng  1

1 Department of Mathematics, University of California Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555, USA
@article{10_2140_agt_2015_15_863,
     author = {Lin, Jianfeng},
     title = {Pin(2){\textendash}equivariant {KO{\textendash}theory} and intersection forms of spin 4{\textendash}manifolds},
     journal = {Algebraic and Geometric Topology},
     pages = {863--902},
     year = {2015},
     volume = {15},
     number = {2},
     doi = {10.2140/agt.2015.15.863},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.2140/agt.2015.15.863/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Lin, Jianfeng
TI  - Pin(2)–equivariant KO–theory and intersection forms of spin 4–manifolds
JO  - Algebraic and Geometric Topology
PY  - 2015
SP  - 863
EP  - 902
VL  - 15
IS  - 2
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.2140/agt.2015.15.863/
DO  - 10.2140/agt.2015.15.863
ID  - 10_2140_agt_2015_15_863
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Lin, Jianfeng
%T Pin(2)–equivariant KO–theory and intersection forms of spin 4–manifolds
%J Algebraic and Geometric Topology
%D 2015
%P 863-902
%V 15
%N 2
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.2140/agt.2015.15.863/
%R 10.2140/agt.2015.15.863
%F 10_2140_agt_2015_15_863
Lin, Jianfeng. Pin(2)–equivariant KO–theory and intersection forms of spin 4–manifolds. Algebraic and Geometric Topology, Tome 15 (2015) no. 2, pp. 863-902. doi: 10.2140/agt.2015.15.863

[1] J F Adams, Prerequisites (on equivariant stable homotopy) for Carlsson's lecture, from: "Algebraic topology" (editors I Madsen, B Oliver), Lecture Notes in Math. 1051, Springer (1984) 483

[2] M F Atiyah, $K\!$–theory, W A Benjamin

[3] M F Atiyah, $K\!$–theory and reality, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 17 (1966) 367

[4] M F Atiyah, Bott periodicity and the index of elliptic operators, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 19 (1968) 113

[5] M F Atiyah, G B Segal, Equivariant $K\!$–theory and completion, J. Differential Geometry 3 (1969) 1

[6] T Tom Dieck, Transformation groups and representation theory, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 766, Springer (1979)

[7] T Tom Dieck, Transformation groups, de Gruyter Studies in Mathematics 8, Walter de Gruyter Co. (1987)

[8] S K Donaldson, An application of gauge theory to four-dimensional topology, J. Differential Geom. 18 (1983) 279

[9] S K Donaldson, The orientation of Yang–Mills moduli spaces and $4$–manifold topology, J. Differential Geom. 26 (1987) 397

[10] K A Frøyshov, The Seiberg–Witten equations and four-manifolds with boundary, Math. Res. Lett. 3 (1996) 373

[11] K A Frøyshov, Equivariant aspects of Yang–Mills Floer theory, Topology 41 (2002) 525

[12] K A Frøyshov, Monopole Floer homology for rational homology $3$–spheres, Duke Math. J. 155 (2010) 519

[13] Y Fukumoto, M Furuta, Homology $3$–spheres bounding acyclic $4$–manifolds, Math. Res. Lett. 7 (2000) 757

[14] M Furuta, Monopole equation and the $\frac{11}8$–conjecture, Math. Res. Lett. 8 (2001) 279

[15] M Furuta, Y Kametani, Equivariant maps between sphere bundles over tori and $\mathrm{KO}$–degree,

[16] M Furuta, T J Li, Intersection forms of spin $4$–manifolds with boundary, preprint (2013)

[17] P Kronheimer, T Mrowka, P Ozsváth, Z Szabó, Monopoles and lens space surgeries, Ann. of Math. 165 (2007) 457

[18] C Manolescu, $\mathrm{Pin}(2)$–equivariant Seiberg–Witten Floer homology and the triangulation conjecture,

[19] C Manolescu, Seiberg–Witten–Floer stable homotopy type of three-manifolds with $b_1=0$, Geom. Topol. 7 (2003) 889

[20] C Manolescu, A gluing theorem for the relative Bauer–Furuta invariants, J. Differential Geom. 76 (2007) 117

[21] C Manolescu, On the intersection forms of spin four-manifolds with boundary, Math. Ann. 359 (2014) 695

[22] Y Matsumoto, On the bounding genus of homology $3$–spheres, J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 29 (1982) 287

[23] N Minami, The $G$–join theorem: An unbased $G$–Freudenthal theorem, preprint

[24] W D Neumann, An invariant of plumbed homology spheres, from: "Topology Symposium" (editors U Koschorke, W D Neumann), Lecture Notes in Math. 788, Springer (1980) 125

[25] W D Neumann, F Raymond, Seifert manifolds, plumbing, $\mu $–invariant and orientation reversing maps, from: "Algebraic and geometric topology" (editor K C Millett), Lecture Notes in Math. 664, Springer (1978) 163

[26] P Ozsváth, Z Szabó, Absolutely graded Floer homologies and intersection forms for four-manifolds with boundary, Adv. Math. 173 (2003) 179

[27] V A Rokhlin, New results in the theory of four-dimensional manifolds, Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 84 (1952) 221

[28] N Saveliev, Fukumoto–Furuta invariants of plumbed homology $3$–spheres, Pacific J. Math. 205 (2002) 465

[29] B Schmidt, Spin $4$–manifolds and $\mathrm{Pin}(2)$–equivariant homotopy theory, PhD thesis, Universität Bielefield (2003)

[30] G Segal, Equivariant $K\!$–theory, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. (1968) 129

[31] L Siebenmann, On vanishing of the Rokhlin invariant and nonfinitely amphicheiral homology $3$–spheres, from: "Topology Symposium" (editors U Koschorke, W D Neumann), Lecture Notes in Math. 788, Springer (1980) 172

[32] S Stolz, The level of real projective spaces, Comment. Math. Helv. 64 (1989) 661

Cité par Sources :