Deformations of noncompact projective manifolds
Algebraic and Geometric Topology, Tome 14 (2014) no. 5, pp. 2595-2625
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Mathematical Sciences Publishers

Voir la notice de l'article

In this paper, we demonstrate that the complete hyperbolic structures of various two-bridge knots and links cannot be deformed to inequivalent strictly convex projective structures. We also prove a complementary result showing that under certain rigidity hypotheses, branched covers of amphicheiral knots admit nontrivial, strictly convex deformations near their complete hyperbolic structure.

DOI : 10.2140/agt.2014.14.2595
Classification : 57M50, 57M60
Keywords: projective structures, two-bridge knots, rigidity

Ballas, Samuel A  1

1 Department of Mathematics, University of California Santa Barbara, South Hall, Room 6607, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
@article{10_2140_agt_2014_14_2595,
     author = {Ballas, Samuel A},
     title = {Deformations of noncompact projective manifolds},
     journal = {Algebraic and Geometric Topology},
     pages = {2595--2625},
     year = {2014},
     volume = {14},
     number = {5},
     doi = {10.2140/agt.2014.14.2595},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.2140/agt.2014.14.2595/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ballas, Samuel A
TI  - Deformations of noncompact projective manifolds
JO  - Algebraic and Geometric Topology
PY  - 2014
SP  - 2595
EP  - 2625
VL  - 14
IS  - 5
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.2140/agt.2014.14.2595/
DO  - 10.2140/agt.2014.14.2595
ID  - 10_2140_agt_2014_14_2595
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Ballas, Samuel A
%T Deformations of noncompact projective manifolds
%J Algebraic and Geometric Topology
%D 2014
%P 2595-2625
%V 14
%N 5
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.2140/agt.2014.14.2595/
%R 10.2140/agt.2014.14.2595
%F 10_2140_agt_2014_14_2595
Ballas, Samuel A. Deformations of noncompact projective manifolds. Algebraic and Geometric Topology, Tome 14 (2014) no. 5, pp. 2595-2625. doi: 10.2140/agt.2014.14.2595

[1] M Artin, On the solutions of analytic equations, Invent. Math. 5 (1968) 277

[2] S Ballas, Examples of two bridge knot and link deformations, Mathematica notebook.

[3] Y Benoist, Convexes divisibles, I, from: "Algebraic groups and arithmetic" (editors S G Dani, G Prasad), Tata Inst. Fund. Res. (2004) 339

[4] Y Benoist, Convexes divisibles, III, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 38 (2005) 793

[5] Y Benoist, Convexes divisibles, IV: Structure du bord en dimension $3$, Invent. Math. 164 (2006) 249

[6] M Boileau, J Porti, Geometrization of $3$–orbifolds of cyclic type, Astérisque 272, Soc. Math. France (2001) 208

[7] K S Brown, Cohomology of groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 87, Springer (1982)

[8] D Cooper, D D Long, M B Thistlethwaite, Computing varieties of representations of hyperbolic $3$–manifolds into $\mathrm{SL}(4,\mathbb R)$, Experiment. Math. 15 (2006) 291

[9] D Cooper, D D Long, M B Thistlethwaite, Flexing closed hyperbolic manifolds, Geom. Topol. 11 (2007) 2413

[10] D Cooper, D D Long, S Tillmann, On convex projective manifolds and cusps,

[11] H Garland, A rigidity theorem for discrete subgroups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 129 (1967) 1

[12] W M Goldman, Geometric structures on manifolds and varieties of representations, from: "Geometry of group representations" (editors W M Goldman, A R Magid), Contemp. Math. 74, Amer. Math. Soc. (1988) 169

[13] A Hatcher, W Thurston, Incompressible surfaces in $2$–bridge knot complements, Invent. Math. 79 (1985) 225

[14] M Heusener, J Porti, Infinitesimal projective rigidity under Dehn filling, Geom. Topol. 15 (2011) 2017

[15] C D Hodgson, S P Kerckhoff, Rigidity of hyperbolic cone-manifolds and hyperbolic Dehn surgery, J. Differential Geom. 48 (1998) 1

[16] D Johnson, J J Millson, Deformation spaces associated to compact hyperbolic manifolds, from: "Discrete groups in geometry and analysis" (editor R Howe), Progr. Math. 67, Birkhäuser (1987) 48

[17] M Kapovich, Hyperbolic manifolds and discrete groups, Progress in Mathematics 183, Birkhäuser (2001)

[18] S Kojima, Deformations of hyperbolic $3$–cone-manifolds, J. Differential Geom. 49 (1998) 469

[19] J L Koszul, Déformations de connexions localement plates, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 18 (1968) 103

[20] L Marquis, Exemples de variétés projectives strictement convexes de volume fini en dimension quelconque, Enseign. Math. 58 (2012) 3

[21] D B Mcreynolds, A W Reid, M Stover, Collisions at infinity in hyperbolic manifolds, Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 155 (2013) 459

[22] W Menasco, A W Reid, Totally geodesic surfaces in hyperbolic link complements, from: "Topology '90" (editors B Apanasov, W D Neumann, A W Reid, L Siebenmann), Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ. 1, de Gruyter (1992) 215

[23] K Murasugi, Remarks on knots with two bridges, Proc. Japan Acad. 37 (1961) 294

[24] J Porti, Torsion de Reidemeister pour les variétés hyperboliques, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 128 (1997)

[25] J G Ratcliffe, Foundations of hyperbolic manifolds, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 149, Springer (2006)

[26] R Riley, Parabolic representations of knot groups, I, Proc. London Math. Soc. 24 (1972) 217

[27] D Rolfsen, Knots and links, Mathematics Lecture Series 7, Publish or Perish (1990)

[28] W P Thurston, The geometry and topology of three-manifolds, Princeton Univ. Math. Dept. Lecture Notes (1979)

[29] A Weil, Remarks on the cohomology of groups, Ann. of Math. 80 (1964) 149

[30] G W Whitehead, Elements of homotopy theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 61, Springer (1978)

Cité par Sources :