Suppose M is a closed irreducible orientable 3–manifold, K is a knot in M, P and Q are bridge surfaces for K and K is not removable with respect to Q. We show that either Q is equivalent to P or d(K,P) ≤ 2 − χ(Q − K). If K is not a 2–bridge knot, then the result holds even if K is removable with respect to Q. As a corollary we show that if a knot in S3 has high distance with respect to some bridge sphere and low bridge number, then the knot has a unique minimal bridge position.
Tomova, Maggy  1
@article{10_2140_agt_2007_7_957,
author = {Tomova, Maggy},
title = {Multiple bridge surfaces restrict knot distance},
journal = {Algebraic and Geometric Topology},
pages = {957--1006},
year = {2007},
volume = {7},
number = {2},
doi = {10.2140/agt.2007.7.957},
url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.2140/agt.2007.7.957/}
}
Tomova, Maggy. Multiple bridge surfaces restrict knot distance. Algebraic and Geometric Topology, Tome 7 (2007) no. 2, pp. 957-1006. doi: 10.2140/agt.2007.7.957
[1] , Thin position with respect to a heegaard surface
[2] , , Distance and bridge position, Pacific J. Math. 219 (2005) 221
[3] , , Reducing Heegaard splittings, Topology Appl. 27 (1987) 275
[4] , Heegaard splittings of Haken manifolds have bounded distance, Pacific J. Math. 204 (2002) 61
[5] , 3–manifolds as viewed from the curve complex, Topology 40 (2001) 631
[6] , , Comparing Heegaard splittings of non-Haken $3$–manifolds, Topology 35 (1996) 1005
[7] , , , Lecture notes on generalized heegaard splittings
[8] , Proximity in the curve complex
[9] , Local detection of strongly irreducible Heegaard splittings, Topology Appl. 90 (1998) 135
[10] , , Thinning genus two Heegaard spines in $S^3$, J. Knot Theory Ramifications 12 (2003) 683
[11] , , Uniqueness of bridge surfaces for 2–bridge knots
[12] , , Alternate Heegaard genus bounds distance, Geom. Topol. 10 (2006) 593
[13] , Thin position for knots in a 3–manifold
Cité par Sources :