Geodesic
On the $T$-conditionality of $T$-power based implications
Kybernetika, Tome 58 (2022) no. 1, pp. 43-63 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Czech Digital Mathematics Library

Voir la notice de l'article

It is well known that, in forward inference in fuzzy logic, the generalized modus ponens is guaranteed by a functional inequality called the law of $T$-conditionality. In this paper, the $T$-conditionality for $T$-power based implications is deeply studied and the concise necessary and sufficient conditions for a power based implication $I^{T}$ being $T$-conditional are obtained. Moreover, the sufficient conditions under which a power based implication $I^{T}$ is $T^{\ast}$-conditional are discussed, this discussions give an ideas to construct a t-norm $T^{\ast}$ such that the power based implication $I^{T}$ is $T^{\ast}$-conditional.
It is well known that, in forward inference in fuzzy logic, the generalized modus ponens is guaranteed by a functional inequality called the law of $T$-conditionality. In this paper, the $T$-conditionality for $T$-power based implications is deeply studied and the concise necessary and sufficient conditions for a power based implication $I^{T}$ being $T$-conditional are obtained. Moreover, the sufficient conditions under which a power based implication $I^{T}$ is $T^{\ast}$-conditional are discussed, this discussions give an ideas to construct a t-norm $T^{\ast}$ such that the power based implication $I^{T}$ is $T^{\ast}$-conditional.
DOI : 10.14736/kyb-2022-1-0043
Classification : 03B52, 03E72
Keywords: $T$-power based implications; $T$-conditionality; t-norms; generalized modus ponens 
@article{10_14736_kyb_2022_1_0043,
     author = {Peng, Zuming},
     title = {On the $T$-conditionality of $T$-power based implications},
     journal = {Kybernetika},
     pages = {43--63},
     year = {2022},
     volume = {58},
     number = {1},
     doi = {10.14736/kyb-2022-1-0043},
     mrnumber = {4405946},
     zbl = {07511610},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2022-1-0043/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Peng, Zuming
TI  - On the $T$-conditionality of $T$-power based implications
JO  - Kybernetika
PY  - 2022
SP  - 43
EP  - 63
VL  - 58
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2022-1-0043/
DO  - 10.14736/kyb-2022-1-0043
LA  - en
ID  - 10_14736_kyb_2022_1_0043
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Peng, Zuming
%T On the $T$-conditionality of $T$-power based implications
%J Kybernetika
%D 2022
%P 43-63
%V 58
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2022-1-0043/
%R 10.14736/kyb-2022-1-0043
%G en
%F 10_14736_kyb_2022_1_0043
Peng, Zuming. On the $T$-conditionality of $T$-power based implications. Kybernetika, Tome 58 (2022) no. 1, pp. 43-63. doi: 10.14736/kyb-2022-1-0043

[1] Alsina, C., Trillas, E.: When ($S, N$)-implications are ($T , T_{1}$)-conditional functions ?. Fuzzy Sets Systems 134 (2003), 305-310. | DOI | MR

[2] Baczyński, M., Grzegorzewski, P., Mesiar, R., Helbin, P., Niemyska, W.: Fuzzy implications based on semicopulas. Fuzzy Sets Systems 323 (2017), 138-151. | DOI | MR

[3] Baczyński, M., Jayaram, B.: Fuzzy Implications, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2008. | MR

[4] Bede, B.: Mathematics of Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2013. | MR

[5] Bustince, H., Pagola, M., Barrenechea, E.: Construction of fuzzy indices from fuzzy DI-subsethood measures: application to the global comparison of images. Inform. Sci. 177 (2007), 906-929. | DOI | MR

[6] Clouaire, R. M.: A fast generalized modus ponens. BUSEFAL 18 (1984), 75-82. | DOI

[7] Driankov, D., Hellendoorn, H., Reinfrank, M.: An Introduction to Fuzzy Control. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1993.

[8] Fodor, J. C., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support, Theory and Decision Library, Serie D: System Theory, Knowledge Engineering and Problem Solving. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1994.

[9] Grzegorzewski, P.: Probabilistic implications. Fuzzy Sets Systems 226 (2013), 53-66. | DOI | MR

[10] Hellendoorn, H.: The generalized modus ponens considered as a fuzzy relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 46 (1992), 29-48. | DOI | MR

[11] Hilletofth, P., Sequeira, M., Adlemo, A.: Three novel fuzzy logic concepts applied to reshoring decision-making. Expert Systems Appl. 126 (2019), 133-143. | DOI

[12] Ivánek, J.: Selection and correction of weighted rules based on lukasiewicz's fuzzy logic with evaluated syntax. Kybernetika 53 (2017), 113-128. | DOI | MR

[13] Kerre, E., Nachtegael, M.: Fuzzy Techniques in Image Processing. Springer, New York 2000.

[14] Klement, E. P., Mesiar, R., Pap, E.: Triangular Norms. Kluwer, Dordrecht 2000. | MR | Zbl

[15] Kolesárová, A., Massanet, S., Mesiar, R., Riera, J. V., Torrens, J.: Polynomial constructions of fuzzy implication functions: The quadratic case. Inform. Sci. 494 (2019), 60-79. | DOI | MR

[16] Li, W. H., Qin, F., Xie, A. F.: Modus Ponens property of $T$-power based implications. Fuzzy Sets Systems 431 (2022), 129-142. | DOI | MR

[17] Mas, M., Monserrat, M., Torrens, J.: Modus Ponens and Modus Tollens in discrete implications. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 49 (2008), 422-435. | DOI | MR

[18] Massanet, S., Recasens, J., Torrens, J.: Fuzzy implication functions based on powers of continuous t-norms. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 83 (2017), 265-279. | DOI | MR

[19] Massanet, S., Recasens, J., Torrens, J.: Corrigendum to "Fuzzy implication functions based on powers of continuous t-norms" [Int. J. Approx. Reason. 83 (2017) 265-279]. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 104 (2019), 144-147. | DOI | MR

[20] Massanet, S., Recasens, J., Torrens, J.: Some characterizations of $T$-power based implications. Fuzzy Sets Systems 359 (2019), 42-62. | DOI | MR

[21] Mizumoto, M., Zimmermann, H. J.: Comparison of fuzzy reasoning methods. Fuzzy Sets Systtems 8 (1982), 253-283. | DOI | MR

[22] Peralta, R. F., Massanet, S., Mir, A.: On strict $T$-power invariant implications: Properties and intersections. Fuzzy Sets Systems 423 (2021), 1-28. | DOI | MR

[23] Peng, Z.: A new family of (A, N)-implications: construction and properties. Iranian J. Fuzzy Systems 17 (2020), 2, 129-145. | MR

[24] Peng, Z.: The study on semicopula based implications. Kybernetika 56 (2020), 4, 662-694. | DOI | MR

[25] Pota, M., Esposito, M., Pietro, G. D.: Likelihood-fuzzy analysis: From data, through statistics, to interpretable fuzzy classifiers. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 93 (2018) 88-102. | DOI | MR

[26] Pradera, A., Massanet, S., Ruiz, D., Torrens, J.: On the use of conjunctors with a neutral element in the modus ponens inequality. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Systems 13 (2020), 1, 201-211. | DOI

[27] Trillas, E., Alsina, C., Pradera, A.: On MPT-implication functions for fuzzy logic. Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Ser. A. Mat. (RACSAM) 98 (2004), 1, 259-271. | MR

[28] Trillas, E., Alsina, C., Renedo, E., Pradera, A.: On contra-symmetry and MPT-conditionality in fuzzy logic. Int. J. Intell. Systems 20 (2005), 313-326. | DOI | MR

[29] Trillas, E., Valverde, L.: On implication and indistinguishability in the setting of fuzzy logic. Read. Fuzzy Sets Intell. Systems (1993), 97-104. | DOI

[30] Yager, R. R.: On some new classes of implication operators and their role in approximate reasoning. Inform. Sci. 167 (2004), 193-216. | DOI | MR

[31] Yan, P., Chen, G.: Discovering a cover set of ARsi with hierarchy from quantitative databases. Inform. Sci. 173 (2005), 319-336. | DOI | MR

[32] Zadeh, L. A.: Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 3 (1973), 28-44. | DOI | MR

Cité par Sources :