Geodesic
A one-way ANOVA test for functional data with graphical interpretation
Kybernetika, Tome 56 (2020) no. 3, pp. 432-458
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Czech Digital Mathematics Library

Voir la notice de l'article

A new functional ANOVA test, with a graphical interpretation of the result, is presented. The test is an extension of the global envelope test introduced by Myllymäki et al. (2017, Global envelope tests for spatial processes, J. R. Statist. Soc. B 79, 381-404, doi: 10.1111/rssb.12172). The graphical interpretation is realized by a global envelope which is drawn jointly for all samples of functions. If a mean function computed from the empirical data is out of the given envelope, the null hypothesis is rejected with the predetermined significance level $\alpha$. The advantages of the proposed one-way functional ANOVA are that it identifies the domains of the functions which are responsible for the potential rejection. We introduce two versions of this test: the first gives a graphical interpretation of the test results in the original space of the functions and the second immediately offers a post-hoc test by identifying the significant pair-wise differences between groups. The proposed tests rely on discretization of the functions, therefore the tests are also applicable in the multidimensional ANOVA problem. In the empirical part of the article, we demonstrate the use of the method by analyzing fiscal decentralization in European countries.
A new functional ANOVA test, with a graphical interpretation of the result, is presented. The test is an extension of the global envelope test introduced by Myllymäki et al. (2017, Global envelope tests for spatial processes, J. R. Statist. Soc. B 79, 381-404, doi: 10.1111/rssb.12172). The graphical interpretation is realized by a global envelope which is drawn jointly for all samples of functions. If a mean function computed from the empirical data is out of the given envelope, the null hypothesis is rejected with the predetermined significance level $\alpha$. The advantages of the proposed one-way functional ANOVA are that it identifies the domains of the functions which are responsible for the potential rejection. We introduce two versions of this test: the first gives a graphical interpretation of the test results in the original space of the functions and the second immediately offers a post-hoc test by identifying the significant pair-wise differences between groups. The proposed tests rely on discretization of the functions, therefore the tests are also applicable in the multidimensional ANOVA problem. In the empirical part of the article, we demonstrate the use of the method by analyzing fiscal decentralization in European countries.
DOI : 10.14736/kyb-2020-3-0432
Classification : 62G10, 62H15
Keywords: global envelope test; groups comparison; permutation test; Europe; fiscal decentralization; nonparametrical methods 
@article{10_14736_kyb_2020_3_0432,
     author = {Mrkvi\v{c}ka, Tom\'a\v{s} and Myllym\"aki, Mari and J{\'\i}lek, Milan and Hahn, Ute},
     title = {A one-way {ANOVA} test for functional data with graphical interpretation},
     journal = {Kybernetika},
     pages = {432--458},
     year = {2020},
     volume = {56},
     number = {3},
     doi = {10.14736/kyb-2020-3-0432},
     mrnumber = {4131738},
     zbl = {07250732},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2020-3-0432/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Mrkvička, Tomáš
AU  - Myllymäki, Mari
AU  - Jílek, Milan
AU  - Hahn, Ute
TI  - A one-way ANOVA test for functional data with graphical interpretation
JO  - Kybernetika
PY  - 2020
SP  - 432
EP  - 458
VL  - 56
IS  - 3
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2020-3-0432/
DO  - 10.14736/kyb-2020-3-0432
LA  - en
ID  - 10_14736_kyb_2020_3_0432
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Mrkvička, Tomáš
%A Myllymäki, Mari
%A Jílek, Milan
%A Hahn, Ute
%T A one-way ANOVA test for functional data with graphical interpretation
%J Kybernetika
%D 2020
%P 432-458
%V 56
%N 3
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2020-3-0432/
%R 10.14736/kyb-2020-3-0432
%G en
%F 10_14736_kyb_2020_3_0432
Mrkvička, Tomáš; Myllymäki, Mari; Jílek, Milan; Hahn, Ute. A one-way ANOVA test for functional data with graphical interpretation. Kybernetika, Tome 56 (2020) no. 3, pp. 432-458. doi: 10.14736/kyb-2020-3-0432

[1] Abramovich, F., Angelini, C.: Testing in mixed-effects FANOVA models. J. Statist. Planning Inference 136 (2006), 4326-4348. | DOI | MR

[2] Ackerman, B.: The rise of world constitutionalism. Virginia Law Rev. 83 (1997), 771-797. | DOI

[3] Alesina, A., Spolaore, E.: On the number and size of nations. Quarterly J. Econom. 112 (1997), 1027-1056. | DOI

[4] Arzaghi, M., Henderson, J. V.: Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. J. Public Econom. 89 (2005), 1157-1189. | DOI

[5] Bolton, P., Roland, G.: The breakup of nations: A political economy analysis. Quarterly J. Econom. 112 (1997), 1057-1090. | DOI

[6] Cerniglia, F.: Decentralization in the public sector: quantitative aspects in federal and unitary countries. J. Pol. Model. 25 (2003), 749-776. | DOI

[7] Choi, H., Reimherr, M.: A geometric approach to confidence regions and bands for functional parameters. J. Royal Statist. Soc.: Series B (Statist. Methodology) 80 (2018), 239-260. | DOI | MR

[8] Cox, D. D., Lee, J. S.: Pointwise testing with functional data using the Westfall-Young randomization method. Biometrika 95 (2008), 621-634. | DOI | MR

[9] Cuesta-Albertos, J., Febrero-Bande, M.: A simple multiway ANOVA for functional data. Test 19 (2010), 537-557. | DOI | MR

[10] Cuevas, A., Febrero, M., Fraiman, R.: An anova test for functional data. Computat. Statist. Data Analysis 47 (2004), 111-122. | DOI | MR

[11] Ermini, B., santolini, R.: does globalization matter on fiscal decentralization? New evidence from the OECD. Global Econom. Rev. 43 (2014), 153-183. | DOI

[12] 2018, Eurostat: Government revenue, Expenditure and Main Aggregates (gov_10a_main).

[13] Febrero-Bande, M., Oviedo de la Fuente, M.: Statistical computing in functional data analysis: The R package fda.usc. J. Statist. Software 51 (2012), 1-28. | DOI

[14] Ferraty, F., Vieu, P., Viguier-Pla, S.: Factor-based comparison of groups of curves. Computat. Statist. Data Analysis 51 (2007), 4903-4910. | DOI | MR

[15] Górecki, T., Smaga, L.: A comparison of tests for the one-way ANOVA problem for functional data. Comput. Statist. 30 (2015), 987-1010. | DOI | MR

[16] Górecki, T., Smaga, L.: fdANOVA: Analysis of Variance for Univariate and Multivariate Functional Data, R package version 0.1.0, 2017. | MR

[17] Hahn, U.: A studentized permutation test for the comparison of spatial point patterns. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 107 (2012), 754-764. | DOI | MR

[18] Loosmore, N. B., Ford, E. D.: Statistical inference using the G or K point pattern spatial statistics. Ecology 87 (2006), 1925-1931. | DOI

[19] Mrkvička, T., Myllymäki, M., Hahn, U.: Multiple Monte Carlo testing, with applications in spatial point processes. Statist. Comput. 27 (2017), 1239-1255. | DOI | MR

[20] Myllymäki, M., Mrkvička, T.: GET: Global envelopes in R. arXiv:1911.06583 stat.ME, 2019.

[21] Myllymäki, M., Mrkvička, T., Grabarnik, P., Seijo, H., Hahn, U.: Global envelope tests for spatial processes. J. Royal Statist. Soc. B 79 (2017), 381-404. | DOI | MR

[22] J., N.-N. Narisetty V., Nair: Extremal depth for functional data and applications. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 111 (2016), 1705-1714. | DOI | MR

[23] Nichols, T. E.., Holmes, E.: Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples. Human Brain M 15 (2001), 1-25. | DOI

[24] Oates, Wallace, E., E: Toward A second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. Int. Tax Public Finance 12 (2005), 349-373. | DOI

[25] Pantazis, D., Nichols, T. E., Baillet, S., Leahya, R. M.: A comparison of random field theory and permutation methods for the statistical analysis of MEG data. Neuroi 25 (2005), 383-394. | DOI

[26] Pini, A., Vantini, S., Colosimo, B. M., Grasso, M.: Domain-selective functional analysis of variance for supervised statistical profile monitoring of signal data. J. Royal Statist. Soc.: Series C (Appl. Statist.) 67 (2001), 55-81. | DOI | MR

[27] Team, R Core: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna 2019.

[28] Ramsay, J., Silverman, B.: Functional Data Analysis. Second edition. Springer Series in Statistics, Springer 2006. | DOI | MR

[29] Rodrik, D.: Why do more open economies have bigger governments?. J. Polit. Economy 106 (1998), 997-1032. | DOI

[30] Sedova, J., Lipovska, H., Fischer: Fiscal autonomy in the secessionist regions. In: Current Trends in Public Sector Research, Masaryk University, Brno 2017.

[31] Spahn, P. B.: Contract Federalims. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Book Section 7, Cheltenham 2015, pp. 144-160.

[32] Stegarescu, D.: Public sector decentralisation: Measurement concepts and recent international trends. Fiscal Stud. 26 (2005), 301-333. | DOI

[33] Stegarescu, D.: The effects of economic and political integration on fiscal decentralization: Evidence from OECD countries. Canadian J. Econom. / Revue Canadienne d'Economique 42 (2009), 694-718. | DOI

[34] Vo, D. H.: New Fiscal Decentralization Indices. The University of Western Australia Discussion Paper 08.14, 93, 2008.

[35] Vo, D. H.: The economics of fiscal decentralization. J. Econom. Surveys 24 (2010), 657-679. | DOI

[36] Vsevolozhskaya, O., Greenwood, M., Holodov, D.: Pairwise comparison of treatment levels in functional analysis of variance with application to erythrocyte hemolysis. Ann. Appl. Statist. 8 (2014), 905-925. | DOI | MR

[37] Zhang, J.-T.: Analysis of Variance for the functional data. Chapman and Hall, 2014. | DOI

Cité par Sources :