Geodesic
An asset – liability management stochastic program of a leasing company
Kybernetika, Tome 54 (2018) no. 6, pp. 1247-1263
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Czech Digital Mathematics Library

Voir la notice de l'article

We build a multi-stage stochastic program of an asset-liability management problem of a leasing company, analyse model results and present a stress-testing methodology suited for financial applications. At the beginning, the business model of such a company is formulated. We introduce three various risk constraints, namely the chance constraint, the Value-at-Risk constraint and the conditional Value-at-Risk constraint along with the second-order stochastic dominance constraint, which are applied to the model to control risk of the optimal strategy. We also present the structure and the generation process of our scenarios. To capture the evolution of interest rates the Hull-White model is used. Thereafter, results of the model and the effect of the risk constraints on the optimal decisions are thoroughly investigated. In the final part, the performance of the optimal solutions of the problems for unconsidered and unfavourable crisis scenarios is inspected. The methodology of a stress test we used was proposed in such a way that it answers typical questions asked by asset-liability managers.
We build a multi-stage stochastic program of an asset-liability management problem of a leasing company, analyse model results and present a stress-testing methodology suited for financial applications. At the beginning, the business model of such a company is formulated. We introduce three various risk constraints, namely the chance constraint, the Value-at-Risk constraint and the conditional Value-at-Risk constraint along with the second-order stochastic dominance constraint, which are applied to the model to control risk of the optimal strategy. We also present the structure and the generation process of our scenarios. To capture the evolution of interest rates the Hull-White model is used. Thereafter, results of the model and the effect of the risk constraints on the optimal decisions are thoroughly investigated. In the final part, the performance of the optimal solutions of the problems for unconsidered and unfavourable crisis scenarios is inspected. The methodology of a stress test we used was proposed in such a way that it answers typical questions asked by asset-liability managers.
DOI : 10.14736/kyb-2018-6-1247
Classification : 90B50, 90C15, 90C31, 91G10
Keywords: asset-liability management; multi-stage stochastic programming; stress test 
@article{10_14736_kyb_2018_6_1247,
     author = {Rus\'y, Tom\'a\v{s} and Kopa, Milo\v{s}},
     title = {An asset {\textendash} liability management stochastic program of a leasing company},
     journal = {Kybernetika},
     pages = {1247--1263},
     year = {2018},
     volume = {54},
     number = {6},
     doi = {10.14736/kyb-2018-6-1247},
     mrnumber = {3902632},
     zbl = {07031772},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2018-6-1247/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Rusý, Tomáš
AU  - Kopa, Miloš
TI  - An asset – liability management stochastic program of a leasing company
JO  - Kybernetika
PY  - 2018
SP  - 1247
EP  - 1263
VL  - 54
IS  - 6
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2018-6-1247/
DO  - 10.14736/kyb-2018-6-1247
LA  - en
ID  - 10_14736_kyb_2018_6_1247
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Rusý, Tomáš
%A Kopa, Miloš
%T An asset – liability management stochastic program of a leasing company
%J Kybernetika
%D 2018
%P 1247-1263
%V 54
%N 6
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2018-6-1247/
%R 10.14736/kyb-2018-6-1247
%G en
%F 10_14736_kyb_2018_6_1247
Rusý, Tomáš; Kopa, Miloš. An asset – liability management stochastic program of a leasing company. Kybernetika, Tome 54 (2018) no. 6, pp. 1247-1263. doi: 10.14736/kyb-2018-6-1247

[1] Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 3 (1999), 203-228. | DOI | MR

[2] Brigo, D., Mercurio, F.: Interest Rate Models - Theory and Practice with Smile, Inflation and Credit. (Second edition.). Springer Verlag, Berlin 2001. | MR

[3] Broeders, D., Chen, A., Koos, B.: An Institutional Evaluation of Pension Funds and Life Insurance Companies. De Nederlandsche Bank, 2009.

[4] Carino, D. R., Kent, T., Myers, D. H., Stacy, C., Sylvanus, M., Turner, A. L., Watanabe, K., Ziemba, W. T.: The Russell-Yasuda Kasai model: An asset/liability model for a Japanese insurance company using multistage stochastic programming. Interfaces 24 (1994), 1, 29-49. | DOI

[5] Chen, R. R., Scott, L.: Maximum likelihood estimation for a multifactor equilibrium model of the term structure of interest rates. J. Fixed Incom. 3 (1003),14-31. | DOI

[6] Cox, J. C., Ingersoll, J. E., Ross, S A.: A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica 53 (1985), 385-407. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[7] Dempster, M. A. H., Ireland, A. M.: MIDAS: An expert debt management advisory system. In: Data, Expert Knowledge and Decisions, Springer 1988, pp. 116-127. | DOI

[8] Dentcheva, D., Ruszczynski, A.: Optimization with stochastic dominance constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 14 (2003), 2, 548-566. | DOI | MR

[9] Dert, C. L.: Asset Liability Management for Pension Funds: A Multistage Chance Constrained Programming Approach. PhD Thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam 1995.

[10] Dupačová, J., Kopa, M.: Robustness in stochastic programs with risk constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. 200 (2012), 1, 55-74. | DOI | MR

[11] Dupačová, J., Kopa, M.: Robustness of optimal portfolios under risk and stochastic dominance constraints. Europ. J. Oper- Res. 234 (2014), 434-441. | DOI | MR

[12] Dupačová, J.: Stability in stochastic programming with recourse. Contaminated distributions. Math. Programm. Study 27 (1986), 133-144. | DOI | MR

[13] Dupačová, J.: Stress testing via contamination. In: Coping with Uncertainty: Modeling and Policy Issues (K. Marti, Y. Ermoliev, M. Makowski, and G. Pflug, eds.), Springer, Berlin 2006, pp. 29-46. | DOI | MR

[14] Dupačová, J., Kozmík, V.: Stress testing for risk-averse stochastic programs. Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae LXXXIV (2015), 2, 205-217. | MR

[15] Dupačová, J., Polívka, J.: Asset-liability management for Czech pension funds using stochastic programming. Ann. Oper. Res. 165 (2009), 5-28. | DOI | MR

[16] Geyer, A., Ziemba, W. T.: The Innovest Austrian pension fund financial planning model InnoALM. Oper. Res. 56 (2008), 4, 797-810. | DOI | MR

[17] Hadar, J., Russell, W. R.: Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Amer. Econom. Rev. 59 (1969), 25-34.

[18] Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., Polya, G.: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1934. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[19] Hoyland, K.: Asset Liability Management for a Life Insurance Company: A Stochastic Programming Approach. PhD Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 1998.

[20] Hull, J., White, A.: Pricing interest-rate derivative securities. Rev. Financ. Stud. 3 (1990), 573-592. | DOI

[21] Haneveld, W. K. Klein, Streutker, M. H., Vlerk, M. H. van der: An ALM model for pension funds using integrated chance constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. 177 (2010), 1, 47-62. | DOI | MR

[22] Kopa, M., Moriggia, V., Vitali, S.: Individual optimal pension allocation under stochastic dominance constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. 260 (2018), 1-2, 255-291. | DOI | MR

[23] Kuosmanen, T.: Efficient diversification according to stochastic dominance criteria. Management Sci. 50 (2004), 10, 1390-1406. | DOI

[24] Kusy, M. I., Ziemba, W. T.: A bank asset and liability management model. Oper. Res. 34 (1986), 356-376. | DOI

[25] Levy, H.: Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis. Management Sci. 38 (1992), 4, 555-593. | DOI

[26] Morgan, J. P.: Risk Metrics. Technical Document. Fourth Edition. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company, New York 1995.

[27] Moriggia, V., Kopa, M., Vitali, S.: Pension fund management with hedging derivatives, stochastic dominance and nodal contamination. Omega - Int. J. Management Sci. 2018. | DOI

[28] Pflug, G. Ch.: Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. In: Probabilistic Constrained Optimization: Methodology and Application (S. P. Uryasev, ed.), Kluwer, 1999. | DOI | MR

[29] Pflug, G. Ch., Pichler, A.: Multistage Stochastic Optimization. Springer Series, New York 2014. | MR

[30] Pliska, S. R., Jinchun, Ye: Optimal life insurance purchase and consumption/investment under uncertain lifetime. J. Banking Finance 31 (2007) 5, 1307-1319. | DOI | MR

[31] Post, T., Kopa, M.: Portfolio choice based on third-degree stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 63 (2017), 10, 3381-3392. | DOI

[32] Post, T., Fang, Y., Kopa, M.: Linear tests for dara stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 61 (2015), 7, 1615-1629. | DOI | MR

[33] Rockafellar, R. T., Uryasev, S.: Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J. Risk 2 (2000), 21-41. | DOI

[34] Rockafellar, R. T., Uryasev, S.: Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance 26 (2002), 7, 1443-1471. | DOI

[35] Telser, L. G.: Safety first and hedging. Rev. Econom. Stud. 23 (1955), 1, 1-16. | DOI

[36] Vasicek, O.: An equilibrium characterization of the term structure. J. Financ. Econom. 5 (1977), 177-188. | DOI

[37] Vitali, S., Moriggia, V., Kopa, M.: Optimal pension fund composition for an italian private pension plan sponsor. Comput. Management Sci. 14 (2017), 1, 135-160. | DOI | MR

Cité par Sources :