Geodesic
Multistage risk premiums in portfolio optimization
Kybernetika, Tome 53 (2017) no. 6, pp. 992-1011
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Czech Digital Mathematics Library

Voir la notice de l'article

This paper deals with a multistage stochastic programming portfolio selection problem with a new type of risk premium constraints. These risk premiums are constructed on the multistage scenario tree. Two ways of the construction are introduced and compared. The risk premiums are incorporated in the multistage stochastic programming portfolio selection problem. The problem maximizes the multivariate (multiperiod) utility function under condition that the multistage risk premiums are smaller than a prescribed level. The problem does not assume any separability of the multiperiod utility function. The performance of the suggested models is demonstrated for several kinds of multiperiod utility functions and several formulations of the multistage risk premium constraints. In all cases, including the risk premium constraints avoids the riskier positions.
This paper deals with a multistage stochastic programming portfolio selection problem with a new type of risk premium constraints. These risk premiums are constructed on the multistage scenario tree. Two ways of the construction are introduced and compared. The risk premiums are incorporated in the multistage stochastic programming portfolio selection problem. The problem maximizes the multivariate (multiperiod) utility function under condition that the multistage risk premiums are smaller than a prescribed level. The problem does not assume any separability of the multiperiod utility function. The performance of the suggested models is demonstrated for several kinds of multiperiod utility functions and several formulations of the multistage risk premium constraints. In all cases, including the risk premium constraints avoids the riskier positions.
DOI : 10.14736/kyb-2017-6-0992
Classification : 91B28, 91B30
Keywords: multistage risk premium; utility function; portfolio optimization; multistage stochastic programming 
@article{10_14736_kyb_2017_6_0992,
     author = {Kopa, Milo\v{s} and Petrov\'a, Barbora},
     title = {Multistage risk premiums in portfolio optimization},
     journal = {Kybernetika},
     pages = {992--1011},
     year = {2017},
     volume = {53},
     number = {6},
     doi = {10.14736/kyb-2017-6-0992},
     mrnumber = {3758931},
     zbl = {06861637},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2017-6-0992/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kopa, Miloš
AU  - Petrová, Barbora
TI  - Multistage risk premiums in portfolio optimization
JO  - Kybernetika
PY  - 2017
SP  - 992
EP  - 1011
VL  - 53
IS  - 6
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2017-6-0992/
DO  - 10.14736/kyb-2017-6-0992
LA  - en
ID  - 10_14736_kyb_2017_6_0992
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Kopa, Miloš
%A Petrová, Barbora
%T Multistage risk premiums in portfolio optimization
%J Kybernetika
%D 2017
%P 992-1011
%V 53
%N 6
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2017-6-0992/
%R 10.14736/kyb-2017-6-0992
%G en
%F 10_14736_kyb_2017_6_0992
Kopa, Miloš; Petrová, Barbora. Multistage risk premiums in portfolio optimization. Kybernetika, Tome 53 (2017) no. 6, pp. 992-1011. doi: 10.14736/kyb-2017-6-0992

[1] Ambarish, R., Kallberg, J. G.: Multivariate risk premiums. Theory Decision 22 (1987), 77-96. | DOI | MR

[2] Branda, M., Kopa, M.: Dea models equivalent to general n-th order stochastic dominance efficiency tests. Oper. Res. Lett.44 (2016), 285-289. | DOI | MR

[3] Duncan, G. T.: A matrix measure of multivariate local risk aversion. Econometrica 45 (1977), 895-903. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[4] Dupačová, J., Kopa, M.: Robustness of optimal portfolios under risk and stochastic dominance constraints. Europ. J. Oper. Res. 234 (2014), 2, 434-441. | DOI | MR

[5] Dupačová, J., Hurt, J., Štěpán, J.: Stochastic Modeling in Economics and Finance. Kluwer, 2002. | MR

[6] Høyland, K., Kaut, M., Wallace, S. W.: A heuristic for moment-matching scenario generation. Comput. Optim. Appl. 24 (2003), 2-3, 169-185. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[7] French, K. R.: 6 portfolios formed on size and book-to-market (2 $\times$ 3).

[8] Kihlstrom, R. E., Mirman, L. J.: Risk aversion with many commodities. J. Econom. Theory 8 (1974), 361-388. | DOI | MR

[9] Kopa, M., Moriggia, V., Vitali, S.: Individual optimal pension allocation under stochastic dominance constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. 260 (2018), 1-2, 255-291. | DOI | MR

[10] Post, T., Kopa, M.: Portfolio choice based on third-degree stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 63 (2017), 10, 3381-3392. | DOI

[11] Post, T., Fang, Y., Kopa, M.: Linear tests for decreasing absolute risk aversion stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 61 (2015), 7, 1615-1629. | DOI

[12] Pratt, J. W.: Risk aversion in the small and the large. Econometrica 32 (1064), 122-136. | DOI

[13] Richard, S. F.: Multivariate risk aversion, utility dependence and separable utility functions. Management Sci. 21 (1975), 12-21. | DOI | MR

[14] Rockafellar, R. T., Uryasev, S.: Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance 26 (2002), 1443-1471. | DOI

[15] Shapiro, A., Dentcheva, D., Ruszczynski, A.: Lectures on Stochastic Programming. SIAM, Philadelphia 2009. | DOI | MR

[16] Šmíd, M., Kopa, M.: Dynamic model of market with uninformed market maker. Kybernetika 53 (2017), 5, 922-958. | DOI

[17] Vitali, S., Moriggia, V., Kopa, M.: Optimal pension fund composition for an italian private pension plan sponsor. Comput. Management Sci. 14 (2017), 1, 135-160. | DOI | MR

Cité par Sources :