Geodesic
Task criticalness potential: A multiple criteria approach to project management
Kybernetika, Tome 52 (2016) no. 4, pp. 558-574 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Czech Digital Mathematics Library

Voir la notice de l'article

The paper proposes the method evaluating tasks criticalness potential, which has been analysed by various project management tools. The criticalness potential of tasks, as opposed to a simple differentiation of tasks to critical and non-critical using the CPM method, considers not only time, but also resource, cost and topological aspects of a project schedule. In the paper, the tasks criticalness potential is defined applying task criticalness indicators which are further used as input for three various multiple criteria decision models. These models enable taking into account the principal project success criteria, i. e. time, resources and cost. The tasks criticalness potential cannot be determined using one indicator or one characteristic only. A selected multi-criteria approach based on task criticalness indicators differentiates between tasks more and less threatening to a project. This paper suggests different multiple criteria approaches to the quantification of task criticalness potential, compares them and discusses their advantages and disadvantages.
The paper proposes the method evaluating tasks criticalness potential, which has been analysed by various project management tools. The criticalness potential of tasks, as opposed to a simple differentiation of tasks to critical and non-critical using the CPM method, considers not only time, but also resource, cost and topological aspects of a project schedule. In the paper, the tasks criticalness potential is defined applying task criticalness indicators which are further used as input for three various multiple criteria decision models. These models enable taking into account the principal project success criteria, i. e. time, resources and cost. The tasks criticalness potential cannot be determined using one indicator or one characteristic only. A selected multi-criteria approach based on task criticalness indicators differentiates between tasks more and less threatening to a project. This paper suggests different multiple criteria approaches to the quantification of task criticalness potential, compares them and discusses their advantages and disadvantages.
DOI : 10.14736/kyb-2016-4-0558
Classification : 90B50, 90B99
Keywords: project management; task threat; criticalness potential; multiple criteria evaluation 
@article{10_14736_kyb_2016_4_0558,
     author = {Bro\v{z}ov\'a, Helena and Barto\v{s}ka, Jan and \v{S}ubrt, Tom\'a\v{s} and Rydval, Jan},
     title = {Task criticalness potential: {A} multiple criteria approach to project management},
     journal = {Kybernetika},
     pages = {558--574},
     year = {2016},
     volume = {52},
     number = {4},
     doi = {10.14736/kyb-2016-4-0558},
     mrnumber = {3565769},
     zbl = {06644310},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2016-4-0558/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Brožová, Helena
AU  - Bartoška, Jan
AU  - Šubrt, Tomáš
AU  - Rydval, Jan
TI  - Task criticalness potential: A multiple criteria approach to project management
JO  - Kybernetika
PY  - 2016
SP  - 558
EP  - 574
VL  - 52
IS  - 4
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2016-4-0558/
DO  - 10.14736/kyb-2016-4-0558
LA  - en
ID  - 10_14736_kyb_2016_4_0558
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Brožová, Helena
%A Bartoška, Jan
%A Šubrt, Tomáš
%A Rydval, Jan
%T Task criticalness potential: A multiple criteria approach to project management
%J Kybernetika
%D 2016
%P 558-574
%V 52
%N 4
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2016-4-0558/
%R 10.14736/kyb-2016-4-0558
%G en
%F 10_14736_kyb_2016_4_0558
Brožová, Helena; Bartoška, Jan; Šubrt, Tomáš; Rydval, Jan. Task criticalness potential: A multiple criteria approach to project management. Kybernetika, Tome 52 (2016) no. 4, pp. 558-574. doi: 10.14736/kyb-2016-4-0558

Cité par Sources :