LQR and MPC controller design and comparison for a stationary self-balancing bicycle robot with a reaction wheel
Kybernetika, Tome 51 (2015) no. 1, pp. 173-191
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Czech Digital Mathematics Library

Voir la notice de l'article

A self-balancing bicycle robot based on the concept of an inverted pendulum is an unstable and nonlinear system. To stabilize the system in this work, the following three main components are required, i. e., (1) an IMU sensor that detects the tilt angle of the bicycle robot, (2) a controller that is used to control motion of a reaction wheel, and (3) a reaction wheel that is employed to produce reactionary torque to balance the bicycle robot. In this paper, we propose three control strategies: linear quadratic regulator (LQR), linear model predictive control (LMPC), and nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC). Several simulation tests have been conducted in order to show that our proposed control laws can achieve stabilizaton and make the system balance. Furthermore, LMPC and NMPC controllers can deal with state and input constraints explicitly.
A self-balancing bicycle robot based on the concept of an inverted pendulum is an unstable and nonlinear system. To stabilize the system in this work, the following three main components are required, i. e., (1) an IMU sensor that detects the tilt angle of the bicycle robot, (2) a controller that is used to control motion of a reaction wheel, and (3) a reaction wheel that is employed to produce reactionary torque to balance the bicycle robot. In this paper, we propose three control strategies: linear quadratic regulator (LQR), linear model predictive control (LMPC), and nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC). Several simulation tests have been conducted in order to show that our proposed control laws can achieve stabilizaton and make the system balance. Furthermore, LMPC and NMPC controllers can deal with state and input constraints explicitly.
DOI : 10.14736/kyb-2015-1-0173
Classification : 49N05, 70E60, 93C85
Keywords: self-balancing bicycle robot; linear quadratic regulator; model predictive control
@article{10_14736_kyb_2015_1_0173,
     author = {Kanjanawanishkul, Kiattisin},
     title = {LQR and {MPC} controller design and comparison for a stationary self-balancing bicycle robot with a reaction wheel},
     journal = {Kybernetika},
     pages = {173--191},
     year = {2015},
     volume = {51},
     number = {1},
     doi = {10.14736/kyb-2015-1-0173},
     mrnumber = {3333839},
     zbl = {06433838},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2015-1-0173/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kanjanawanishkul, Kiattisin
TI  - LQR and MPC controller design and comparison for a stationary self-balancing bicycle robot with a reaction wheel
JO  - Kybernetika
PY  - 2015
SP  - 173
EP  - 191
VL  - 51
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2015-1-0173/
DO  - 10.14736/kyb-2015-1-0173
LA  - en
ID  - 10_14736_kyb_2015_1_0173
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Kanjanawanishkul, Kiattisin
%T LQR and MPC controller design and comparison for a stationary self-balancing bicycle robot with a reaction wheel
%J Kybernetika
%D 2015
%P 173-191
%V 51
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.14736/kyb-2015-1-0173/
%R 10.14736/kyb-2015-1-0173
%G en
%F 10_14736_kyb_2015_1_0173
Kanjanawanishkul, Kiattisin. LQR and MPC controller design and comparison for a stationary self-balancing bicycle robot with a reaction wheel. Kybernetika, Tome 51 (2015) no. 1, pp. 173-191. doi: 10.14736/kyb-2015-1-0173

[1] Allgöwer, F., Findeisen, R., Nagy, Z. K.: Nonlinear model predictive control: from theory to application. J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng. 35 (2004), 3, 299-315.

[2] Beznos, A. V., Formalsky, A. M., Gurfinkel, E. V., Jicharev, D. N., Lensky, A. V., Savitsky, K. V., Tchesalin, L. S.: Control of autonomous motion of two-wheel bicycle with gyroscopic stabilization. In: Proc. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven 1998, pp. 2670-2675. | DOI

[3] Bui, T., Parnichkun, M.: Balancing control of bicyrobo by particle swarm optimization-based structure-specified mixed h2/hinf control. Internat. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 5 (2008), 4, 395-402. | DOI

[4] Defoort, M., Murakami, T.: Second order sliding mode control with disturbance observer for bicycle stabilization. In: Proc. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nice 2008, pp. 2822-2827. | DOI

[5] Gallaspy, J.: Gyroscopic Stabilization of an Unmanned Bicycle. Master's Thesis, Auburn University, 1999.

[6] Keo, L., Masaki, Y.: Trajectory control for an autonomous bicycle with balancer. In: Proc. IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, Xi'an 2008, pp. 676-681. | DOI

[7] Keo, L., Yamakita, M.: Control of an autonomous electric bicycle with both steering and balancer controls. Adv. Robot. 25 (2011), 1-22. | DOI

[8] Lee, S., Ham, W.: Self-stabilizing strategy in tracking control of unmanned electric bicycle with mass balance. In: Proc. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Lausanne 2002, pp. 2200-2205. | DOI

[9] Lei, G., Qi-zheng, L., Shi-min, W., Yu-feng, Z.: Design of linear quadratic optimal controller for bicycle robot, automation and logistics. In: Proc. International Conference on Automation and Logistics (ICAL), Shenyang 2009, pp. 1968-1972. | DOI

[10] Mayne, D. Q., Rawlings, J. B., Rao, C. V., Scokaert, P. O. M.: Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica 36 (2000), 6, 789-814. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[11] Pongpaew, P.: Balancing Control of a Bicycle Robot by Centrifugal Force. Master's Thesis, Asian Institute of Technology, 2010.

[12] Scokaert, P. O. M., Rawlings, J. B.: Constrained linear quadratic regulation. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 43 (1998), 8, 1163-1169. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[13] Tanaka, Y., Murakami, T.: Self sustaining bicycle robot with steering controller. In: Proc. IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, Kawasaki 2004, pp. 193-197. | DOI

[14] Yi, J., Song, D., Levandowski, A., Jayasuriya, S.: Trajectory tracking and balance stabilization control of autonomous motorcycle. In: Proc. International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando 2006, pp. 2583-2589. | DOI

Cité par Sources :