Geodesic
FullSWOF Paral: Comparison of two parallelization strategies (MPI and SKELGIS) on a software designed for hydrology applications
S. Cordier1 ; H. Coullon2 ; O. Delestre3 ; C. Laguerre1 ; M. H. Le4 ; D. Pierre5 ; G. Sadaka6
1 MAPMO, fédération Denis Poisson, University of Orléans, France,
2 LIFO, University of Orléans & Géo-Hyd, France,
3 Lab. J.A. Dieudonné & EPU Nice Sophia, University of Nice, France,
4 MAPMO & BRGM, University of Orléans, France,
5 Géo-Hyd, 101 rue Jacques Charles, 45160 Olivet, France,
6 LAMFA, University of Picardie, France,
ESAIM. Proceedings, Tome 43 (2013), pp. 59-79 Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source EDP Sciences

Voir la notice de l'article

In this paper, we perform a comparison of two approaches for the parallelization of an existing, free software, FullSWOF2D (http ://www.univ-orleans.fr/mapmo/soft/FullSWOF/ that solves shallow water equations for applications in hydrology) based on a domain decomposition strategy. The first approach is based on the classical MPI library while the second approach uses Parallel Algorithmic Skeletons and more precisely a library named SkelGIS (Skeletons for Geographical Information Systems). The first results presented in this article show that the two approaches are similar in terms of performance and scalability. The two implementation strategies are however very different and we discuss the advantages of each one.
DOI : 10.1051/proc/201343004

S. Cordier 1 ; H. Coullon 2 ; O. Delestre 3 ; C. Laguerre 1 ; M. H. Le 4 ; D. Pierre 5 ; G. Sadaka 6

1 MAPMO, fédération Denis Poisson, University of Orléans, France,
2 LIFO, University of Orléans & Géo-Hyd, France,
3 Lab. J.A. Dieudonné & EPU Nice Sophia, University of Nice, France,
4 MAPMO & BRGM, University of Orléans, France,
5 Géo-Hyd, 101 rue Jacques Charles, 45160 Olivet, France,
6 LAMFA, University of Picardie, France, 
@article{EP_2013_43_a4,
     author = {S. Cordier and H. Coullon and O. Delestre and C. Laguerre and M. H. Le and D. Pierre and G. Sadaka},
     title = {FullSWOF {Paral:} {Comparison} of two parallelization strategies {(MPI} and {SKELGIS)} on a software designed for hydrology applications},
     journal = {ESAIM. Proceedings},
     pages = {59--79},
     year = {2013},
     volume = {43},
     doi = {10.1051/proc/201343004},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/proc/201343004/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - S. Cordier
AU  - H. Coullon
AU  - O. Delestre
AU  - C. Laguerre
AU  - M. H. Le
AU  - D. Pierre
AU  - G. Sadaka
TI  - FullSWOF Paral: Comparison of two parallelization strategies (MPI and SKELGIS) on a software designed for hydrology applications
JO  - ESAIM. Proceedings
PY  - 2013
SP  - 59
EP  - 79
VL  - 43
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/proc/201343004/
DO  - 10.1051/proc/201343004
LA  - en
ID  - EP_2013_43_a4
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A S. Cordier
%A H. Coullon
%A O. Delestre
%A C. Laguerre
%A M. H. Le
%A D. Pierre
%A G. Sadaka
%T FullSWOF Paral: Comparison of two parallelization strategies (MPI and SKELGIS) on a software designed for hydrology applications
%J ESAIM. Proceedings
%D 2013
%P 59-79
%V 43
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/proc/201343004/
%R 10.1051/proc/201343004
%G en
%F EP_2013_43_a4
S. Cordier; H. Coullon; O. Delestre; C. Laguerre; M. H. Le; D. Pierre; G. Sadaka. FullSWOF Paral: Comparison of two parallelization strategies (MPI and SKELGIS) on a software designed for hydrology applications. ESAIM. Proceedings, Tome 43 (2013), pp. 59-79. doi: 10.1051/proc/201343004

Cité par Sources :