The Use of CFSE-like Dyes for Measuring Lymphocyte Proliferation : Experimental Considerations and Biological Variables
Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena, Tome 7 (2012) no. 5, pp. 53-64.

Voir la notice de l'article provenant de la source EDP Sciences

The measurement of CFSE dilution by flow cytometry is a powerful experimental tool to measure lymphocyte proliferation. CFSE fluorescence precisely halves after each cell division in a highly predictable manner and is thus highly amenable to mathematical modelling. However, there are several biological and experimental conditions that can affect the quality of the proliferation data generated, which may be important to consider when modelling dye dilution data sets. Here we overview several of these variables including the type of fluorescent dye used to monitor cell division, dye labelling methodology, lymphocyte subset differences, in vitro versus in vivo experimental assays, cell autofluorescence, and dye transfer between cells.
DOI : 10.1051/mmnp/20127505

B.J.C. Quah 1 ; A.B. Lyons 2 ; C.R. Parish 1

1 Department of Immunology, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
2 School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
@article{MMNP_2012_7_5_a4,
     author = {B.J.C. Quah and A.B. Lyons and C.R. Parish},
     title = {The {Use} of {CFSE-like} {Dyes} for {Measuring} {Lymphocyte} {Proliferation} : {Experimental} {Considerations} and {Biological} {Variables}},
     journal = {Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena},
     pages = {53--64},
     publisher = {mathdoc},
     volume = {7},
     number = {5},
     year = {2012},
     doi = {10.1051/mmnp/20127505},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/mmnp/20127505/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - B.J.C. Quah
AU  - A.B. Lyons
AU  - C.R. Parish
TI  - The Use of CFSE-like Dyes for Measuring Lymphocyte Proliferation : Experimental Considerations and Biological Variables
JO  - Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena
PY  - 2012
SP  - 53
EP  - 64
VL  - 7
IS  - 5
PB  - mathdoc
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/mmnp/20127505/
DO  - 10.1051/mmnp/20127505
LA  - en
ID  - MMNP_2012_7_5_a4
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A B.J.C. Quah
%A A.B. Lyons
%A C.R. Parish
%T The Use of CFSE-like Dyes for Measuring Lymphocyte Proliferation : Experimental Considerations and Biological Variables
%J Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena
%D 2012
%P 53-64
%V 7
%N 5
%I mathdoc
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/mmnp/20127505/
%R 10.1051/mmnp/20127505
%G en
%F MMNP_2012_7_5_a4
B.J.C. Quah; A.B. Lyons; C.R. Parish. The Use of CFSE-like Dyes for Measuring Lymphocyte Proliferation : Experimental Considerations and Biological Variables. Mathematical modelling of natural phenomena, Tome 7 (2012) no. 5, pp. 53-64. doi : 10.1051/mmnp/20127505. http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1051/mmnp/20127505/

[1] S.A. Weston, C.R. Parish J Immunol Methods 1990 87 97

[2] A.B. Lyons, C.R. Parish J Immunol Methods 1994 131 7

[3] A.B. Lyons Immunol Cell Biol 1999 509 15

[4] R.E. Nordon, S.S. Ginsberg, C.J. Eaves Br J Haematol 1997 528 39

[5] C.R. Parish, M.H. Glidden, B.J. Quah, H.S. Warren Curr Protoc Immunol 2009 4.9.1 4.9.13

[6] J. Lastóvicka, V. Budinsky, R. Spisek, J. Bartunkova Cell Immunol 2009 79 85

[7] B.J. Quah, C.R. Parish J Immunol Methods 2012 1 14

[8] B.J. Quah, H.S. Warren, C.R. Parish Nat Protoc 2007 2049 56

[9] B.J. Quah, C.R. Parish. The use of carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE) to monitor lymphocyte proliferation. Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 44 (2010).

[10] R.N. Morrison, A.B. Lyons, B.F. Nowak, J.D. Hayball Fish Shellfish Immunol 2004 307 19

[11] T. Holyoake, X. Jiang, C. Eaves, A. Eaves Blood 1999 2056 64

[12] J.E. Ueckert, G. Nebe Von-Caron, A.P. Bos, P.F. Ter Steeg Lett Appl Microbiol 1997 295 9

[13] P.D. Hodgkin, J.H. Lee, A.B. Lyons J Exp Med 1996 277 81

[14] A.V. Gett, P.D. Hodgkin Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998 9488 93

[15] J. Hasbold, A.B. Lyons, M.R. Kehry, P.D. Hodgkin Eur J Immunol 1998 1040 51

[16] J. Hasbold, P.D. Hodgkin Cytometry 2000 230 7

[17] S. Blake, T.P. Hughes, G. Mayrhofer, A.B. Lyons Clin Immunol 2008 330 9

[18] S.J. Blake, A.B. Lyons, T.P. Hughes J Cell Mol Med 2009 599 601

[19] C.K. Fraser, S.J. Blake, K.R. Diener, A.B. Lyons, M.P. Brown, T.P. Hughes, J.D. Hayball Exp Hematol 2009 256 65

[20] R.E. Nordon, M. Nakamura, C. Ramirez, R. Odell Immunol Cell Biol 1999 523 9

[21] R.J. De Boer, V.V. Ganusov, D. Milutinovic, P.D. Hodgkin, A.S. Perelson Bull Math Biol 2006 1011 31

[22] E.D. Hawkins, M. Hommel, M.L. Turner, F.L. Battye, J.F. Markham, P.D. Hodgkin Nat Protoc 2007 2057 67

[23] R.E. Nordon, K.H. Ko, R. Odell, T. Schroeder J Theor Biol 2011 7 18

[24] H.Y. Lee, E. Hawkins, M.S. Zand, T. Mosmann, H. Wu, P.D. Hodgkin, A.S. Perelson Bull Math Biol 2009 1649 70

[25] S.J. Blake, T.P. Hughes, A.B. Lyons. Drug-interaction studies evaluating T-cell proliferation reveal distinct activity of dasatinib and imatinib in combination with cyclosporine A. Exp Hematol, (2012).

[26] H.T. Banks, K.L. Sutton, W.C. Thompson, G. Bocharov, M. Doumic, T. Schenkel, J. Argilaguet, S. Giest, C. Peligero, A. Meyerhans J Immunol Methods 2011 143 60

[27] H.T. Banks, K.L. Sutton, W.C. Thompson, G. Bocharov, D. Roose, T. Schenkel, A. Meyerhans Bull Math Biol 2011 116 50

[28] C.R. Parish Immunol Cell Biol 1999 499 508

[29] R. Zeng, R. Spolski, E. Casas, W. Zhu, D.E. Levy, W.J. Leonard Blood 2007 4135 42

[30] P.K. Wallace, J.D. Tario, J.L. Fisher, S.S. Wallace, M.S. Ernstoff, K.A. Muirhead Cytometry, Part A 2008 1019 34

[31] Y. Singh, J. Dyson, O.A. Garden Immunol Letters 2011 21 9

[32] D.A. Fulcher, A.B. Lyons, S.L. Korn, M.C. Cook, C. Koleda, C. Parish, B. Fazekas De St Groth, A. Basten J Exp Med 1996 2313 28

[33] A.B. Lyons Immunol Cell Biol 1997 7 12

[34] A.B. Lyons J Immunol Methods 2000 147 54

[35] A.B. Lyons., J. Hasbold, P.D. Hodgkin Method Cell Biol 2001 375 98

[36] A.B. Lyons, K.V. Doherty. Flow cytometric analysis of cell division by dye dilution. Current protocols in cytometry, (2004), Chapter 9 : Unit 9 11.

[37] A.B. Lyons, M. Watkins, C.C. Simpson, H. Konrad Muller Immunol Invest 2006 75 92

[38] B.J. Quah, V.P. Barlow, V. Mcphun, K.I. Matthaei, M.D. Hulett, C.R. Parish Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008 4259 64

[39] G. Chaudhri, B.J. Quah, Y. Wang, A.H. Tan, J. Zhou, G. Karupiah, C.R. Parish Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009 14984 14989

Cité par Sources :