Dunkl-Gabor transform and time-frequency concentration
Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, Tome 65 (2015) no. 1, pp. 255-270
Cet article a éte moissonné depuis la source Czech Digital Mathematics Library

Voir la notice de l'article

The aim of this paper is to prove two new uncertainty principles for the Dunkl-Gabor transform. The first of these results is a new version of Heisenberg's uncertainty inequality which states that the Dunkl-Gabor transform of a nonzero function with respect to a nonzero radial window function cannot be time and frequency concentrated around zero. The second result is an analogue of Benedicks' uncertainty principle which states that the Dunkl-Gabor transform of a nonzero function with respect to a particular window function cannot be time-frequency concentrated in a subset of the form $S\times \mathcal B(0,b)$ in the time-frequency plane $\mathbb R^d\times \widehat {\mathbb R}^d$. As a side result we generalize a related result of Donoho and Stark on stable recovery of a signal which has been truncated and corrupted by noise.
The aim of this paper is to prove two new uncertainty principles for the Dunkl-Gabor transform. The first of these results is a new version of Heisenberg's uncertainty inequality which states that the Dunkl-Gabor transform of a nonzero function with respect to a nonzero radial window function cannot be time and frequency concentrated around zero. The second result is an analogue of Benedicks' uncertainty principle which states that the Dunkl-Gabor transform of a nonzero function with respect to a particular window function cannot be time-frequency concentrated in a subset of the form $S\times \mathcal B(0,b)$ in the time-frequency plane $\mathbb R^d\times \widehat {\mathbb R}^d$. As a side result we generalize a related result of Donoho and Stark on stable recovery of a signal which has been truncated and corrupted by noise.
DOI : 10.1007/s10587-015-0172-7
Classification : 42C20, 43A32, 46E22
Keywords: time-frequency concentration; Dunkl-Gabor transform; uncertainty principles
@article{10_1007_s10587_015_0172_7,
     author = {Ghobber, Saifallah},
     title = {Dunkl-Gabor transform and time-frequency concentration},
     journal = {Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal},
     pages = {255--270},
     year = {2015},
     volume = {65},
     number = {1},
     doi = {10.1007/s10587-015-0172-7},
     mrnumber = {3336037},
     zbl = {06433733},
     language = {en},
     url = {http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1007/s10587-015-0172-7/}
}
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ghobber, Saifallah
TI  - Dunkl-Gabor transform and time-frequency concentration
JO  - Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
PY  - 2015
SP  - 255
EP  - 270
VL  - 65
IS  - 1
UR  - http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1007/s10587-015-0172-7/
DO  - 10.1007/s10587-015-0172-7
LA  - en
ID  - 10_1007_s10587_015_0172_7
ER  - 
%0 Journal Article
%A Ghobber, Saifallah
%T Dunkl-Gabor transform and time-frequency concentration
%J Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal
%D 2015
%P 255-270
%V 65
%N 1
%U http://geodesic.mathdoc.fr/articles/10.1007/s10587-015-0172-7/
%R 10.1007/s10587-015-0172-7
%G en
%F 10_1007_s10587_015_0172_7
Ghobber, Saifallah. Dunkl-Gabor transform and time-frequency concentration. Czechoslovak Mathematical Journal, Tome 65 (2015) no. 1, pp. 255-270. doi: 10.1007/s10587-015-0172-7

[1] Bonami, A., Demange, B., Jaming, P.: Hermite functions and uncertainty principles for the Fourier and the windowed Fourier transforms. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 19 (2003), 23-55. | DOI | MR

[2] Jeu, M. F. E. de: The Dunkl transform. Invent. Math. 113 (1993), 147-162. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[3] Demange, B.: Uncertainty principles for the ambiguity function. J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 72 (2005), 717-730. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[4] Donoho, D. L., Stark, P. B.: Uncertainty principles and signal recovery. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49 (1989), 906-931. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[5] Dunkl, C. F.: Integral kernels with reflection group invariance. Can. J. Math. 43 (1991), 1213-1227. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[6] Dunkl, C. F.: Differential-difference operators associated to reflection groups. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 311 (1989), 16-183. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[7] Faris, W. G.: Inequalities and uncertainty principles. J. Math. Phys. 19 (1978), 461-466. | DOI | MR

[8] Ghobber, S., Jaming, P.: Uncertainty principles for integral orperators. Stud. Math. 220 (2014), 197-220. | DOI | MR

[9] Gröchenig, K.: Uncertainty principles for time-frequency representations. Advances in Gabor Analysis H. G. Feichtinger et al. Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis Birkhäuser, Basel (2003), 11-30. | MR | Zbl

[10] Havin, V., Jöricke, B.: The Uncertainty Principle in Harmonic Analysis. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete 3. Folge. 28 Springer, Berlin (1994). | MR

[11] Hogan, J. A., Lakey, J. D.: Time-Frequency and Time-Scale Methods: Adaptive Decompositions, Uncertainty Principles, and Sampling. Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis Birkhäuser, Boston (2005). | MR | Zbl

[12] Lapointe, L., Vinet, L.: Exact operator solution of the Calogero-Sutherland model. Commun. Math. Phys. 178 (1996), 425-452. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[13] Mejjaoli, H.: Practical inversion formulas for the Dunkl-Gabor transform on $\mathbb R^d$. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 23 (2012), 875-890. | DOI | MR

[14] Mejjaoli, H., Sraieb, N.: Uncertainty principles for the continuous Dunkl Gabor transform and the Dunkl continuous wavelet transform. Mediterr. J. Math. 5 (2008), 443-466. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[15] Polychronakos, A. P.: Exchange operator formalism for integrable systems of particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992), 703-705. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[16] Rösler, M.: An uncertainty principle for the Dunkl transform. Bull. Aust. Math. Soc. 59 (1999), 353-360. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[17] Rösler, M., Voit, M.: Markov processes related with Dunkl operators. Adv. Appl. Math. 21 (1998), 575-643. | DOI | MR | Zbl

[18] Shimeno, N.: A note on the uncertainty principle for the Dunkl transform. J. Math. Sci., Tokyo 8 (2001), 33-42. | MR | Zbl

[19] Wilczok, E.: New uncertainty principles for the continuous Gabor transform and the continuous wavelet transform. Doc. Math., J. DMV (electronic) 5 (2000), 201-226. | MR | Zbl

Cité par Sources :